Search for: "People v. Clinton"
Results 141 - 160
of 1,252
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jan 2021, 9:01 pm
Bush’s administration, but when Bill Clinton took office in 1993, he withdrew the executive order that had imposed the rule. [read post]
24 Jan 2021, 8:41 am
Means v. [read post]
18 Jan 2021, 9:00 pm
“Trump Prepares to Offer Clemency to More Than 100 People in His Final Hours in Office,” reported yesterday’s Washington Post. [read post]
18 Jan 2021, 8:15 am
Hobby Lobby Stores Bush v. [read post]
17 Jan 2021, 11:28 am
Justice Chase wrote in Calder v. [read post]
17 Jan 2021, 9:28 am
Kelsey Clinton analyzed oral arguments in the Supreme Court’s Nestlé USA, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Jan 2021, 11:40 am
One particularly high-profile case is that of Kristine Gebbie, President Clinton’s chief AIDS policy officer. [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 7:21 am
In Collins v. [read post]
8 Jan 2021, 12:31 pm
District Court for the District of Columbia, Hoffa v. [read post]
7 Jan 2021, 8:28 am
” President Bill Clinton ultimately gave clemency to 16 FALN members, nine of whom had been convicted of seditious conspiracy. [read post]
31 Dec 2020, 6:29 pm
Term Limits v. [read post]
21 Dec 2020, 9:47 am
The landmark Supreme Court ruling Roe v. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 1:53 pm
Overall, many more people turned out to vote in 2020 than turned out in 2016. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 1:53 pm
Overall, many more people turned out to vote in 2020 than turned out in 2016. [read post]
2 Dec 2020, 1:35 pm
Losing the lottery results in these five people getting their federal convictions affirmed.It's a criminal case that gets taken en banc and that results in a starkly partisan split. [read post]
1 Dec 2020, 10:35 am
Bush and Bill Clinton. [read post]
[Eugene Volokh] First Amendment Generally Protects Speech in the U.S. by Non-U.S.-Citizens/Residents
23 Nov 2020, 12:53 pm
From Khan v. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 8:18 pm
But you are not my people. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 1:38 pm
Miller (Wikipedia) U.S. v. [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 10:30 am
The president lacks the power to excise provisions from statutes, and in a 6-3 decision in Clinton v. [read post]
