Search for: "People v. Harrison" Results 141 - 160 of 293
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Oct 2013, 11:14 am by Larry Catá Backer
United States. 379 U.S. 241 (1964) (commerce power could be used to apply an anti-discrimination statute to an establishment that served people in interstate travel and that could affect national policy); Katzenbach v. [read post]
4 Jul 2006, 12:19 pm
The case is called Campbell, aka Skyywalker, et al. v Acuff Rose Music, Inc. 510 U.S. 569 (1994). [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 9:32 am by S
Second,in Harrison v SSHD [2012] EWCA Civ 1736, the Court of Appeal held that the right only extended to those person who cared for children who would otherwise be compelled to leave the country.Finally, in R (Sanneh) v SSWP [2013] EWHC 793 (Admin), the Administrative Court held that the provision of subsistence payments and accommodation under s.17, Children Act 1989 were sufficient to ensure that an individual would not be compelled to leave the UK.In R (HC)… [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 2:31 am by INFORRM
The law of what people are allowed to do with their drones in the vicinity of other people’s property is undeveloped and the Counterclaim raises reasonable issues in this regard. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 2:24 am by Schachtman
A supreme flouting of the military and industrial contexts can be found in DeVries v. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 6:00 am
Does the law work for or against the people needing sump pumps? [read post]
7 Sep 2013, 2:36 pm by Stephen Bilkis
The court notes that information provided by an identified citizen accusing another individual of the commission of a specific crime is sufficient to provide the police with probable cause to arrest as also ruled in People v Lee, Kramer v City of New York and People v Gonzalez. [read post]
20 Jun 2010, 6:27 am by INFORRM
In Beechwood Homes (NSW) Pty Ltd v Camenzuli ([2010] NSWSC 521) Harrison J granted orders restraining the defendant from publishing certain material on its website in an injurious falsehood claim. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 6:09 pm by Wolfgang Demino
 In Henry v Cash Biz the Supremes had another chance to demonstrate their commitment to denying people harmed by shady business practices from getting any relief from the State’s judicial system; they embraced that opportunity wholeheartedly as much as coldheartedly, with not a single member of the court writing in dissent. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 12:20 am by lsammis
Many people have asked us about the status of the “source code” motions in Hillsborough County. [read post]