Search for: "People v. Lilly"
Results 141 - 160
of 228
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Feb 2011, 1:49 pm
Briefly, courts have adopted the learned intermediary rule because:Warnings go to physicians because they are the only people who know both a particular patient’s medical history as well as the risk/benefit profile of the drug/device being prescribed.Limiting warning duties to physicians makes the common law consistent with warning duties imposed by the FDA.Routing prescription drug/device information through the doctor preserves the physician/patient relationship from outside… [read post]
19 Feb 2011, 3:32 pm
Katz v. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 1:06 pm
The circuit court found that the Oklahoma court lacked personal jurisdiction over Frazee, but the Supreme Court of Missouri reversed in People’s Bank v. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 6:46 am
”And one of my new favorites:In Pappas v. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 6:46 am
”And one of my new favorites:In Pappas v. [read post]
19 Oct 2010, 12:20 pm
The court followed the reasoning of Ehlis v. [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 5:56 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
23 Sep 2010, 12:44 pm
Lillis v. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 4:43 pm
In UFCW Local 1776 v. [read post]
15 Sep 2010, 2:40 am
(Afro-IP) Africa: Giving consumers power in the battle against counterfeits (Afro-IP) Australia: Review Four Corners’ ‘Body Corporate’ program on gene patenting (Patentology) India: Roche and Novartis, finally, manage to defend their patents in oppositions filed by Cipla (Spicy IP) South Africa: San people push for new legislation – demand protection for indigenous knowledge and IP including medicinal remedies derived from plants including Hoodia (Afro-IP) US:… [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 1:44 am
Eli Lilly, 09-0222-cv Supreme Court, New York County: Part 5Criminal Practice City Denied Summary Judgment on Claims by Bicyclist Rendered Paralyzed in Accident Somma v. [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 7:35 am
If the tax is not assessable in India, there is no question of TDS being deducted by an assessee;(v) The general principle of fiscal legislation is that given a sufficient territorial connection or nexus between the person sought to be charged and the country seeking to tax him, income tax may extend to that person. [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 12:46 pm
" Eli Lilly & Co. v. [read post]
21 Jul 2010, 9:09 am
http://tinyurl.com/2ebwzx5 Eli Lilly Co. v. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 4:36 pm
Lilly; URochester v. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 12:35 am
You can read it for yourself here.The IPKat's friend Colin Birss QC has drawn his attention to a landmark ruling in an American case about patenting genes: AMP v USPTO 09 Civ 4515 (DJ Sweet). [read post]
3 Apr 2010, 6:19 pm
" Eli Lilly & Co. v. [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 6:00 am
Eli Lilly and Co., pp. 12, 26. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 12:17 pm
Eli Lilly and Co. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 2:30 am
: The Medicines Company v David Kappos et al (FDA Law Blog) Advate (Antihemophilic) – US: False marking complaint filed in N D Illinois: Simonian v. [read post]
