Search for: "People v. McConnell" Results 141 - 160 of 394
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Aug 2023, 4:00 am by Eric Segall
Dedicated to Retired Judge Dick Posner Two of America's most prominent conservative constitutional law professors, both self-described originalists, Will Baude and Michael Paulsen, have penned a 126-page opus explaining why Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment disqualifies on its own terms with no enabling legislation Donald Trump and likely many others from holding office under the United States or any state. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 8:40 am by JB
They wanted to use originalism to overturn Plessy v. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 1:24 pm by Erica Goldberg
Despite the Supreme Court’s recent 8-1 decision in Snyder v. [read post]
16 Sep 2022, 5:00 am by Eric Segall
The new test, asking what would Trump/Pence/McConnell think if they were still alive, has the benefits of a closed inquiry into the minds of three people, thus evading indeterminacy critiques. [read post]
31 Dec 2022, 3:12 pm by James Romoser
It has been hailed as one of the most important civil-rights decisions for people with disabilities. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
The problem is that the baseless claims that Democrats have gone off the deep end are not merely being heard from people like McConnell and the shouters on Fox News. [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 4:11 am by Edith Roberts
The first was Hughes v. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 5:05 am by Will Baude
"  Trump's brief on the merits in the Supreme Court in Trump v. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 12:49 pm by WIMS
Supreme Court in the case of Citizens United v. [read post]
12 Jul 2008, 2:29 pm
Try teaching some of Rehnquist's more murky opinions -- say, Morrison v. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 7:26 am by Peter Vickery
The source of the uncertainty is the recent decision in Noel Canning v. [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
The Supreme Court and the New Challenge to the ACA As Professor Michael Dorf explained in his Verdict column yesterday, the Supreme Court has agreed to hear a new challenge to the ACA, King v. [read post]
28 Mar 2014, 5:56 am by Amy Howe
” Briefly: At Fortune, Roger Parloff previews next week’s oral arguments in Alice Corporation v. [read post]
17 Nov 2021, 5:14 am by Jack Goldsmith, Bob Bauer
But the Supreme Court’s invalidation of the legislative veto in INS v. [read post]