Search for: "People v. Superior Court (Brown)" Results 141 - 160 of 319
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 May 2016, 2:50 pm
Before his appointment to the Court of Appeal, he was appointed to San Diego Superior Court in 1993 and elected in 1994. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 8:12 am by John Elwood
Brown, 14-10186 (a Jewish prisoner denied permission to meet and pray with others because prison officials believed there were an insufficient number of people for organized prayer under their understanding of Judaism); Ben-Levi is joined by two-time relists Amgen Inc. v. [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 8:35 am by David Gans
  Much of Moreno’s piece does not even address the facts, preferring instead to attack civil rights advocates from Brown v. [read post]
17 Sep 2015, 6:01 am by Administrator
The Supreme Court Act 2003, which established the new Supreme Court, was enacted soon after. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 6:22 am
 Rekte was, as explained below, convicted after a trial held in the Superior Court of Riverside County. [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 6:07 am by Marie-Andree Weiss
Superior Court, a California Court of appeals case, to posit that state law determines whether copyright may be claimed in works of state and local government. [read post]
31 Jul 2015, 7:48 am by Ken White
County Superior Court claiming $10 million in damages for defamation and false light invasion of privacy. [read post]
27 Jun 2015, 7:17 am by Paul Smith
  The cause of civil rights was not set back by Brown v. [read post]
20 May 2015, 12:22 pm
Later in the book, we return to these principles in describing the Nullification Crisis and President Jackson’s (correct) response to it (Chapter 6), the Secession Crisis and President Lincoln’s (correct) response to it (Chapter 7), and Southern resistance to Brown v. [read post]
13 May 2015, 6:30 am by Reuel Schiller
Even if the California courts didn’t wish to go that far (this was, after all, three years before Brown v. [read post]
5 Apr 2015, 3:52 pm by Stephen Bilkis
In People v Trabazo [193 Misc.2d 436] (180 Misc 2d 961 [Crim Ct, Queens County 1999]), it was held that these limitations on superior courts were sound procedural mechanisms. [read post]