Search for: "People v. Superior Court (Marks"
Results 141 - 160
of 456
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Mar 2019, 8:56 am
Zobel, who served on the Massachusetts Superior Court and who had assembled a remarkable collection of Holmes materials over decades of research into the justice’s judicial career — I was able to be the first biographer of Holmes to make a thorough examination of Holmes’ experiences as a trial judge. [read post]
14 Mar 2019, 4:00 am
People want these protections provided by that professional status of a lawyer. [read post]
1 Mar 2019, 5:01 am
” The federal Court of Appeals pointed out that it is not bound by a Maine Superior Court decision because a Maine Superior Court decision does not bind the Maine Law Court. [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 3:42 pm
Fudge v. [read post]
4 Feb 2019, 6:00 am
Speakers will include Secretary of the Army Mark Esper, Secretary of the Navy Richard Spencer, Secretary of the Air Force Heather Wilson and moderator Kathleen H. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 2:26 pm
Human Rights First is committed to recruiting, retaining, and developing staff from a diversity of backgrounds, including members of racial and ethnic minorities, LGBT people, people with disabilities, people of all socioeconomic backgrounds, people of all nationalities, and veterans of the U.S. [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 11:46 am
A selected Federal Government candidate will be assigned to the equivalent of Executive Schedule Level V. [read post]
15 Nov 2018, 10:30 pm
Wilson, Stephen Wizner, and Mark E. [read post]
5 Nov 2018, 9:25 am
A selected Federal Government candidate will be assigned to the equivalent of Executive Schedule Level V. [read post]
16 Oct 2018, 8:17 am
Question: Your title (like mine) comes from the Supreme Court’s 1968 opinion in Tinker v. [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 12:49 pm
, Kavanaugh joined an opinion holding that a police reserve officer’s emails to his superiors, in which he cc’d his co-workers, were not protected under the balancing test adopted by the Supreme Court in Pickering v. [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 7:00 am
Under a theory derived from Marbury v. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 8:51 am
Mark Anderson, Respondents. [read post]
6 Jun 2018, 4:29 am
At PrawfsBlawg, Richard Re remarks that although “the justices ultimately chose not to address the precedential significance of 4-1-4 decisions,” “the Court’s ruling still managed to undermine one of the main defenses of the Marks rule” for extracting precedent from fragmented opinions, which finds the Marks rule “desirable because it aligns with the ‘predictive model’ of precedent, whereby lower courts… [read post]
24 May 2018, 1:13 pm
In AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
3 May 2018, 2:00 am
The Superior Court of Los Angeles County. [read post]
3 May 2018, 2:00 am
The Superior Court of Los Angeles County. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 1:20 am
Supreme Court issued its unanimous decision in Cyan, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Apr 2018, 1:01 am
Supreme Court, he heard the case Brown v. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 3:27 pm
S. 552, 561- 562 (1988) (internal quotation marks omitted). [read post]
