Search for: "People v. Turley" Results 141 - 160 of 171
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Sep 2024, 3:00 am by jonathanturley
It did not seem to matter to her that, in the 2018 in NIFLA v. [read post]
16 Nov 2023, 4:00 am by jonathanturley
Jonathan Turley, an attorney, constitutional law scholar and legal analyst, is the Shapiro Chair for Public Interest Law at The George Washington University Law School. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 4:28 pm by Jeff Gamso
Either way, the good news is that there's nothing to stop him from keeping his job.The people of West Salem may take what comfort they can from that.H/t Jonathan Turley and Kevin Underhill. [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 7:00 am by jonathanturley
After all, she noted, her critics are not questioning the two white people she appointed. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 3:15 am by jonathanturley
Here is the column: In their historic ruling in Dobbs v. [read post]
6 Nov 2008, 10:19 pm
Each state has different rules.In New York, as it happens, our highest court dealt with the subject this year in Bernstein v Penny Whistle Toys, Inc. [read post]
21 Mar 2022, 5:00 am by jonathanturley
Jonathan Turley is the Shapiro Professor of Public Interest Law at George Washington University. [read post]
4 Jul 2024, 1:06 pm by Randy E. Barnett
(2021) Donald Drakeman, The Hollow Core of Constitutional Theory: Why We Need the Framers (2021) Jamal Greene, How Rights Went Wrong: Why Our Obsession With Rights is Tearing America Apart (2021) David Schwartz, The Spirit of the Constitution: John Marshall and the 200-Year Odyssey of McCulloch v. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 5:50 am by INFORRM
The AI chatbot wrongly accused Jonathan Turley of making sexually suggestive comments during a class trip and attempting to touch a student, citing a 2018 article in the Post. [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 6:00 am by Administrator
The first case study is an analysis of various lawyers’ and law firms’ blogs about the 2014 Supreme Court case of Clark v. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 3:41 am by Mirriam Seddiq
  Speaking of dead and communication.In a decision that basically all but over-ruled their decision in Crawford v. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 12:00 am by George M. Wallace
Supreme Court in the affirmative action case of United Steelworkers of America v. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
But some calls for reform arise more from a felt need to respond to what are seen as abuses of the confirmation process in very recent years.[13]  As is well-known, the Senate refused even to consider President Obama’s nomination of Merrick Garland in March 2016, shortly after the death of Justice Scalia in February, on the ground that it was within 8 months of a presidential election and the Senate should wait and “give the people a voice” in the selection of a new… [read post]