Search for: "Petition of Kelly"
Results 141 - 160
of 771
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Aug 2022, 7:45 am
Louisiana, 2022) the court granted the petition of Soguey Aracely Ariza Lopez (“Ariza”) against Respondent Kelly Christopher Ash (“Ash”) for the return MCAA to Honduras. [read post]
7 Oct 2021, 7:00 am
Thus, the court concluded, the four-month statute of limitations began to run on May 31, 2018, and Officer's petition, filed in September 2019, was untimely. [read post]
19 Apr 2017, 8:02 am
” Secretary John Kelly: “Yes sir. [read post]
22 Oct 2015, 5:33 am
Kelly alleged in his petition that, prior to J.O.'s death, J.O. requested coverage for contents from Grantham-Adkins in connection with his purchase of insurance. [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 1:54 am
” At Second Thoughts, Jake Charles highlights a cert petition that involves potential tort liability stemming from online sales of firearms. [read post]
10 Dec 2007, 5:31 am
Attorney for State: Kelly A. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 4:00 am
*Durudogan appealed and Supreme Court, New York County, granted City of New York’s motion to dismiss his Article 78 petition. [read post]
10 Mar 2022, 11:18 am
The document which initiates the probate process is the Petition for Probate. [read post]
17 Mar 2015, 7:36 am
Spurlock alleged in his petition that, prior to J.O. [read post]
10 Nov 2008, 3:08 pm
Docket: 07-11073 (capital case) Title: Kelly v. [read post]
29 May 2024, 6:00 am
On the contrary, the charges notified petitioner in detail of the conduct charged (see Wolfe v Kelly, 79 AD3d 406, 407, 410 [1st Dept 2010], appeal dismissed 17 NY3d 844 [2011]). [read post]
29 May 2024, 6:00 am
On the contrary, the charges notified petitioner in detail of the conduct charged (see Wolfe v Kelly, 79 AD3d 406, 407, 410 [1st Dept 2010], appeal dismissed 17 NY3d 844 [2011]). [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 4:00 am
"The court concluded that, under the circumstances, the dismissal of Petitioner from his employment with the Department did not shock its judicial conscience, citing Matter of Kelly v Safir, 96 NY2d 32, among other decisions.The decision is posted on the Internet at:http://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2020/2020_03472.htm [read post]
25 May 2023, 2:05 am
Supreme Court denied Plaintiff's petition to vacate a determination of Respondents, which denied Plaintiff's application for World Trade Center Accidental Disability Retirement (WTC ADR) benefits, and dismissing the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78. [read post]
A CPLR challenge to a administrative determination is subject to a four-month statute of limitations
24 Apr 2020, 4:00 am
" In dismissing the member's Article 78 decision the Appellate Division opined that the Retirement System's response to the member's letter in 2017 "did not extend the [Article 78] limitations period" for bringing a timely action.As the Appellate Division held in Baloy v Kelly, 92 AD3d 521, a request for reconsideration of an administrative determination neither extends nor enlarges the statute of limitation for filing a timely Article… [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 4:00 am
"The court concluded that, under the circumstances, the dismissal of Petitioner from his employment with the Department did not shock its judicial conscience, citing Matter of Kelly v Safir, 96 NY2d 32, among other decisions.The decision is posted on the Internet at:http://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2020/2020_03472.htm [read post]
21 May 2013, 7:02 am
As to the Commissioner’s decision to terminate the police officer, citing Kelly v Safir, 96 NY2d 32, the Appellate Division said that “The penalty imposed does not shock the conscience since [the Commissioner] is accountable to the public for the integrity of the Department. [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 4:00 am
”* The Appellate Division, citing Douglaston Civic Assn. v Galvin, 36 NY2d 1, noted that the Commissioner’s 2013 decision denying Officer's request for a new hearing based on such “new evidence” could not reviewed in the instant proceeding as a separately brought petition was required. [read post]
A CPLR challenge to a administrative determination is subject to a four-month statute of limitations
24 Apr 2020, 4:00 am
" In dismissing the member's Article 78 decision the Appellate Division opined that the Retirement System's response to the member's letter in 2017 "did not extend the [Article 78] limitations period" for bringing a timely action.As the Appellate Division held in Baloy v Kelly, 92 AD3d 521, a request for reconsideration of an administrative determination neither extends nor enlarges the statute of limitation for filing a timely Article… [read post]
25 May 2023, 2:05 am
Supreme Court denied Plaintiff's petition to vacate a determination of Respondents, which denied Plaintiff's application for World Trade Center Accidental Disability Retirement (WTC ADR) benefits, and dismissing the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78. [read post]
