Search for: "Posner v. Posner" Results 141 - 160 of 2,199
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Feb 2007, 2:17 pm
Providing a nice counter-point to what I considered troublesome work last week in Boyd (discussed here and here and here), Judge Posner today in US v. [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 5:46 am by Kenneth J. Vanko
" Very little in the way of case law helps us figure out a uniform test, despite the fact the Trade Secrets Act is a uniform act adopted everywhere now but New York, Massachusetts, and Texas.It is appropriate, therefore, to look elsewhere, including Judge Posner's opinion in Nightingale Home Healthcare, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Oct 2013, 3:24 pm by Will Baude
(Will Baude) Two weeks ago, Jonathan noted that in an interview with Mike Sacks of the Huffington Post, Judge Richard Posner said that he thought he’d been wrong to uphold Indiana’s voter ID statute in Crawford v. [read post]
29 Oct 2009, 5:31 pm
 And yet our patience has lately improved.Judge Richard Posner helped today by explaining, in an ironically long opinion for him, why judicial sound bites can make bad law. [read post]
28 Jun 2015, 7:27 am
How does Judge Posner reconcile his great fondness and respect for Justice Holmes’s famous dissent in Lochner v. [read post]
10 Dec 2014, 1:00 pm
That’s Judge Posner’s opinion for the Seventh Circuit in American Amusement Machine Association v. [read post]
5 Feb 2012, 9:53 am by Mary L. Dudziak
Eric Posner has spent much of the last decade criticizing the liberal legal response to post-9/11 government policies. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 8:20 am by Marcia Oddi
Updating yesterday's ILB summary of Judge Posner's opinion in U.S. v. [read post]
16 Mar 2013, 12:07 pm by Florian Mueller
In yesterday's post on Google's opening brief in the appeal of Judge Posner's Apple v. [read post]
14 Aug 2008, 8:30 pm
In the current issue of The New Republic, Senior Lecturer Richard Posner has published an article in which he discusses the repercussions of the Supreme Court's recent decision in District of Columbia v. [read post]