Search for: "Powers v. State Bar (1988)" Results 141 - 160 of 351
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Mar 2007, 5:34 am
Eli Lilly & Co., 751 P.2d 923, 936 (Cal. 1988) (citations omitted). [read post]
26 Dec 2006, 5:25 am
In Security Pacific National Bank v. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 8:10 am
  "This, in part, might reflect the common culture of law school course pedagogy, in which the utility of a course directed in the short term to the bar and in the middle term to the first job, is an important way that students weigh the value of a course (and therefore the amount of time that ought to be devoted to its mastery." [read post]
3 May 2007, 10:20 am
App. 1975) (a "state can never sue in tort in its political or governmental capacity"), aff'd, 356 N.E.2d 561 (Ill. 1976).Chicago v. [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 2:31 pm by Eugene Volokh
But a categorical prohibition barring one activist in a political movement from posting anything online -- true, false, or opinion -- about another clearly violates the First Amendment. [read post]
18 Jul 2022, 5:55 am by Eugene Volokh
State Bar, 366 U.S. 36, 49 n.10 (1961) (perjury); Illinois ex rel. [read post]
14 Jan 2008, 1:38 pm
  Most of all, it seemed in doubt about whether it can rule in this case without casting aside some precedents — including, perhaps, a noteworthy 1988 decision  (California v. [read post]
21 Nov 2016, 11:30 am by Rick Houghton
  Background The INFT was signed by President Ronald Reagan and General Secretary Mikhail Gorbachev in December 1987 and ratified by both states in 1988. [read post]
According to an LA Times account earlier this week, an online petition at change.org calling for the California State Bar to disbar Mr. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 2:20 pm by Mark Graber
McFarland draft an internal letter stating that the President had not directed Flynn to discuss sanctions with Kislyak. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (Hallam) v Secretary of State for Justice; R (Nealon) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 8-9 May 2018. [read post]