Search for: "Prince v. Prince" Results 141 - 160 of 2,842
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jul 2019, 12:49 pm by Oludolapo Akinkugbe
Earlier this month, in The Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Oct 2007, 4:26 pm
  The text of the complaint:     Jonathan Lee Riches ©, Plaintiff v. [read post]
15 Sep 2023, 8:19 am by Unreported Opinions
Williams’ right leg, which had been injured in a motor […] The post TERENCE WILLIAMS v. [read post]
10 Oct 2007, 12:45 pm
Peter Schjeldahl's review of the Richard Prince retrospective now up at the Guggenheim refers to Prince's "1983 photograph of an infamous Garry Gross photograph ... of a naked Brooke Shields, aged ten, her prepubescent body oiled and her face given womanly makeup," and says Prince "enjoyed the spectacle of Shields's failed later effort, in a lawsuit, to quash Gross's picture, which her mother had authorized for four hundred and fifty… [read post]
7 Apr 2022, 10:00 am by Josh H. Escovedo
Not surprisingly, the Warhol Foundation asked the Second Circuit to reconsider the matter en banc and consider the effect of the Supreme Court’s ruling in Google v. [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 2:52 am by Ben
Graham’s images. 1709 readers will remember Mr Prince from the 2013 U.S. case of Cariou v Prince where Mr Prince largely succeeded with his fair use defence after 'transforming' Mr Cariou's photographs of Rastafarians in Jamaica. [read post]
22 May 2007, 3:44 am
Via subscription service Lawtel comes His Royal Highness the Prince of Wales v Associated Newspapers Ltd, a Chancery Division decision yesterday from Mr Justice Blackburne. [read post]
3 Aug 2022, 4:32 am by INFORRM
Judgment was reserved but it has now been given: Guardian News and Media v The Executor of HRH The Prince Philip, Duke of Edinburgh [2022] EWCA Civ 1081. [read post]
25 Apr 2013, 9:52 am by Rebecca Tushnet
I haven't had time to go through the full ruling, but given the widespread dissemination of the photos as (necessarily) part of explaining the court's ruling, and now in the US Reports, it has to be noted how much less control Patrick Cariou has over his images, even the unaltered ones, than he did before this began. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 1:32 pm by Sergio Muñoz Sarmiento
Stanford Law School professor Paul Goldstein opines on the Graham v. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 5:18 pm by Sergio Muñoz Sarmiento
…there’s a good chance the answer won’t be a simple “guilty” or “not guilty” for Prince. [read post]
30 Apr 2021, 5:02 pm by Howard Bashman
Prince Photog Asked How Supreme Court Ruling Impacts Warhol Case”: Kyle Jahner of Bloomberg Law has a report (subscription required for full access) that begins, “The Second Circuit asked a photographer how the Supreme Court’s Google v. [read post]
19 Oct 2013, 3:00 pm by Sergio Muñoz Sarmiento
As readers will surmise from the title, my presentation, Cariou v. [read post]