Search for: "Providence Health & Services, Appellant V. Department Of Health, Respondent" Results 141 - 160 of 354
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jun 2018, 2:48 pm by Edith Roberts
Department of Health and Human Services, in 2015, Kavanaugh would have held that the ACA complied with the clause of the Constitution that requires all bills for raising revenue to originate in the House of Repre [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Darnley v Croydon Health Services NHS Trust, heard 7 Jun 2018. [read post]
7 May 2018, 11:29 am by David J. Halberg, Esq.
This includes specifications for pre-suit notice (including sending a copy of the complaint to the Department of Health and the Agency for Health Care Administration), to determine if conduct alleged subjects a licensee to disciplinary action. [read post]
18 Apr 2018, 7:53 pm by Shea Denning
A witness who has received training and holds a current certification as a Drug Recognition Expert, issued by the State Department of Health and Human Services, shall be qualified to give the testimony under this subdivision. [read post]
4 Apr 2018, 10:48 am by Steven M. Sweat
The Supreme Court of California ruled that balance billing is not allowed in the state in Prospect Health Source Medical Group, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. [read post]
4 Apr 2018, 10:48 am by Steven M. Sweat
The Supreme Court of California ruled that balance billing is not allowed in the state in Prospect Health Source Medical Group, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 5:40 am
Arbitrator Barry noted that although pursuant to VTL Sec. 313, a policy may not be canceled retroactively, the insurance carrier may assert the fraudulent procurement of the policy by the assignor in an action by a health care provider assignee for no-fault benefits. [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 4:47 am by Marty Lederman
  That court, by a vote of 6 to 3, denied the government’s motion to stay a preliminary injunction that Judge Tanya Chutkan issued against officials of the Department of Health and Human Services, prohibiting them from interfering with the efforts of Doe’s guardian and attorney ad litem to transport her to a clinic to obtain an abortion. [read post]
24 Oct 2017, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Further, ALJ Gloade was not persuaded that Anonymous’ mental health prevented her from responding to department notices or reporting to work for over 13 months. [read post]
The petitioners argued that there were unusual circumstances due to “the inherently noxious and controversial nature of a portion of Planned Parenthood’s services” which would cause significant environmental impacts (traffic, parking, public health and safety, noise, etc.) due to protests that would occur as a result of the approval. [read post]
The petitioners argued that there were unusual circumstances due to “the inherently noxious and controversial nature of a portion of Planned Parenthood’s services” which would cause significant environmental impacts (traffic, parking, public health and safety, noise, etc.) due to protests that would occur as a result of the approval. [read post]
29 Aug 2017, 5:57 pm by Jon Gelman
” The Appellate Division held:"In reaching her decision, in this case, the judge appropriately employed this process and also relied upon our decision in Coalition for Quality Health Care v. [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 6:07 pm by Lisa Milam-Perez
Kaplan began his public service in 2007 as a special assistant in the DOL’s Office of Labor-Management Standards. [read post]