Search for: "Quinn v. United States"
Results 141 - 160
of 396
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Mar 2012, 7:58 pm
In Feingold v. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 8:26 am
United States (7-2 per Roberts). [read post]
24 Apr 2013, 8:34 am
He challenged his convictions on a number of grounds, and contended that his sentence of life without the possibility of parole is unconstitutional under the United States Supreme Court’s recent decision in Miller v. [read post]
17 Jan 2011, 7:59 pm
From the intro: Leading off this week are two stays from the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
16 May 2018, 6:07 am
AFSCME Council 31, which is currently pending before the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
5 Feb 2019, 2:03 pm
At the recent FTC v. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 6:39 am
Judge, 10-367, and Quinn v. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 4:00 am
The First Amendment prohibits a State’s collecting an agency shop fee from an individual on behalf of an employee organization that the individual does not wish to join or supportHarris v Quinn, USSC #11-681, decided June 30, 2014The U.S. [read post]
2 May 2022, 7:42 am
The hiQ v. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 1:10 am
Silih v Slovenia (2009) 49 E.H.R.R. 37 – Read judgment, McCaughey and Quinn’s Application [2010] NICA 13 – Read judgment This is Part I of Matthew Hill’s feature. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 1:34 pm
(2) Does Section 514 of the Uruguay Round Agreements Act violate the First Amendment of the United States Constitution? [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 7:48 am
Quinn (2014). [read post]
23 Dec 2013, 5:00 am
Quinn, in which the Court will consider whether a group of home health care workers funded by Medicaid are state employees and therefore required to pay their “fair share” of the costs of union representation, continues with a guest post from Ann Hodges, who argues that the case “has the potential to knock out one of the pillars under the carefully balanced labor law system in the United States. [read post]
6 Apr 2016, 7:25 am
Case 2: InCom Corp. v. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 12:40 pm
United States United States v. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 5:15 am
The Northern District of CA dismissed the class action suit in September 2014 on the theory that the case did not have sufficient ties to the United States to overcome the presumption against extraterritoriality under the test set forth by the Supreme Court in Kiobel v. [read post]
10 Jul 2014, 6:34 am
At the Maryland Appellate Blog, Steve Klepper discusses the possibility that Justice Clarence Thomas could be questioning whether the Court’s decision in Citizens United applies to the states. [read post]
23 Sep 2020, 11:35 pm
In Sisvel v. [read post]
11 Sep 2017, 9:18 am
Quinn, 287 S.W.3d 158, 177 (Tex. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 9:31 am
Teva, Barr and APP all appealed from the judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Delaware holding that U.S. [read post]
