Search for: "Russell v. Georgia"
Results 141 - 160
of 188
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Sep 2014, 10:30 am
Bishop’s case rather than applying the non-weighing prejudice test consistent with Georgia’s capital sentencing statute articulated in Zant v. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 12:00 pm
Our policy is to include and disclose all cases in which Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, represents either a party or an amicus in the case, with the exception of the rare cases in which Goldstein & Russell represents the respondent(s) but does not appear on the briefs in the case. [read post]
31 Dec 2012, 7:47 pm
Our policy is to include and disclose all cases in which Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys work for or contribute to this blog in various capacities, represents either a party or an amicus in the case, with the exception of the rare cases in which Goldstein & Russell represents the respondent(s) but does not appear on the briefs in the case. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 11:29 am
Co. v. [read post]
14 May 2013, 2:36 pm
California12-7822Issue: Whether, under Georgia v. [read post]
27 Sep 2014, 10:06 am
” Russell v. [read post]
8 May 2015, 9:18 am
[Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel to the petitioner in this case.] [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 5:45 am
(relisted after the June 13 conference) Georgia v. [read post]
24 May 2021, 9:05 pm
In Lucia v. [read post]
21 May 2015, 10:19 am
[Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel to the petitioner in this case.] [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 7:05 pm
Our policy is to include and disclose all cases in which Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, represents either a party or an amicus in the case, with the exception of the rare cases in which Goldstein & Russell, P.C. represents the respondent(s) but does not appear on the briefs in the case. [read post]
26 Jun 2020, 3:47 am
” [Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is counsel on an amicus brief in support of respondent Stephens in Harris Funeral Homes v. [read post]
21 Jan 2018, 4:51 pm
The Data Protection Commissioner and Facebook Ireland Limited and Maximillian Schrems, Affidavit of Peter Swire, Georgia Institute of Technology – Scheller College of Business Next Week in the Courts On 22 January 2018 there is an application in the case of ABC v Google Inc. [read post]
1 Jun 2021, 7:42 am
(In some instances, this was because the releases had had been obtained by a third party, Russell, which assigned the contracts to Topps.) [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 2:20 pm
Title: Ozuna v. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 2:42 pm
Barton v. [read post]
30 Dec 2015, 1:18 pm
Russell, 218 S.E.2d 54, 62–63 (Ga. 1975); O’Brien v. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 2:16 am
(Afro-IP) Poland Poland: the battle over OXFORD (Class 46) Scotland Damages for damaging a brand: Tullis Russell v Inveresk (IP finance) South Africa SAIIPL’s new pres, transhipment and Afro-IP stats (Afro-IP) Johnson & Johnson application dismissed in counterfeit goods case (Afro-IP) Taiwan Trademark priority rights and the Taiwan question (China Hearsay) United Kingdom Belgian SCAM brings cash to British journos (1709 Blog) The PCC Page, no.6: Judge injects meaning… [read post]
11 Nov 2024, 12:54 am
IPSO 00529-24 Universities UK and the Russell Group v The Sunday Times, 1 Accuracy, 10 Clandestine devices and subterfuge, No breach – after investigation Statements in Open Court and Apologies We are not aware of any Statements in Open Court or apologies from the last week. [read post]
