Search for: "SAXON v. SAXON" Results 141 - 160 of 200
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Nov 2009, 12:00 am
Budejovicky Budvar Narodni Podnik v Anheuser-Busch Inc (Class 46) (IPKat) EPO: Should green technology be subject to compulsory licensing? [read post]
29 May 2009, 10:02 am
As an example of Realist interpretation, consider Justice Cardozo's decision in Steward Machine v. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 8:45 am by Lovechilde
As Justice Antonin Scalia wrote in his dissenting opinion in Hamdi v. [read post]
31 May 2019, 10:53 am by David Bernstein
For example, right in the beginning of the book, on page 4, Jacobson discusses the case of Rollins v. [read post]
25 Feb 2007, 9:09 pm
  They could accept the 13th amendment, but nothing past that.With 1896's Plessy v. [read post]
23 Apr 2009, 4:20 am
According to New York University Professor Nouriel Roubini, the Anglo-Saxon model of supervision and regulation of the financial system has failed - the same may be true for numerous corporations.[3]   Professor Roubini remarks, “Indeed, it seems that for approximately nine years, the U.S. [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 6:34 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: New Zealand Prime Minister announces s 92A ‘three strikes’ copyright provision will be scrapped (Excess Copyright) (Michael Geist) (TorrentFreak) (Ars Technica) (ContentAgenda) (Managing Intellectual Property) (Public Knowledge) (Excess Copyright) (IPKat) US: TomTom files countersuit against Microsoft claiming its Streets… [read post]
2 Aug 2016, 12:50 pm by John Rubin
In recognizing the availability of the defense, the federal courts have observed that “‘Congress in enacting criminal statutes legislates against a background of Anglo-Saxon common law. [read post]
2 Aug 2016, 12:50 pm by John Rubin
In recognizing the availability of the defense, the federal courts have observed that “‘Congress in enacting criminal statutes legislates against a background of Anglo-Saxon common law. [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 5:00 am
(Spicy IP) Copyright in characters – III – Delhi High Court decision in Raja Pocket Books v Radha Pocket Books (Spicy IP)   Kenya Anti-Counterfeit Bill 2008 passed (Afro-IP) Kenya’s new anti-counterfeit legislation discussion (Afro-IP)   Kuwait Kuwait adopts international classes 42-45 (Kuwaitmark)   Macedonia New Industrial Property Law (Class 46)   Nigeria Court moves from Uyo to continue proceedings in New York in… [read post]
29 Jul 2021, 11:40 pm by Léon Dijkman
Even in the US, where courts have exercised discretion over patent injunctions since the Supreme Court's 2006 decision in eBay v. [read post]
5 Sep 2011, 10:22 am
 The Hearing Officer, Allan James, cut through the various changes in personnel (15 individuals in all) by referring to Laddie J's analysis in Byford v Oliver [2003] EWHC 295 (Ch) over claims to the band name 'Saxon'. [read post]
21 Jan 2022, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
[The ad was an ad for a college that he had attended, though the Washington Commission on Judicial Conduct concluded that it could also be reasonably viewed as a campaign ad.] [read post]
30 Sep 2022, 7:00 pm
  A ceremony, which from the Russian perspective was characterized as the celebration of the absorption by the Russian Federation of the Ukrainian territories now called the Donetsk People's Republic, the Lugansk People's Republic, the Zaporozhye Region and the Kherson Region,  took place in of the Grand Kremlin Palace’s St George Hall on September 30, 2022 at 16:00.At the event, the President of the Russian Federation delivered… [read post]