Search for: "SMITH v. U.S. GOVERNMENT et al" Results 141 - 160 of 257
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am by Ronald Collins
  So far as books by Justices are concerned, this new offering is more refined, extensive, and current than what had appeared previously in Fenton Martin and Robert Goehlert’s The U.S. [read post]
3 Mar 2012, 5:36 pm by Schachtman
Minn. 2008)(noting that some but not all courts have concluded relative risks under two support finding expert witness’s opinion to be inadmissible) XYZ, et al. v. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 3:34 pm by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
This is a veritable 'Hobson's Choice' involving a decision which, as in the case of Jackson, et al. v. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 8:25 am by Schachtman
Carmichael, 526 U.S. 137, 152 (1999). [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 11:45 am
Golden Gate National Senior Care LLC dba Golden Living et al., No. 2:09-cv-00627 (N.D. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 4:46 pm by FDABlog HPM
Kappos et al., Case No. 2010-1534, perhaps starting (or ending) another chapter in the saga over a Patent Term Extension (“PTE”) for U.S. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 6:15 am by val_kimber
OF CA, ET AL. 10-879 KURNS, GLORIA G., ET AL. v. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 1:32 am
In 2001, the case of Golan et al v Holder was brought by a collection of plaintiffs, including orchestra conductors, educators, performers, motion picture distributors and publishers against the United States government alleging that Section 514 of the Uruguay Round Agreements Act (URAA)- section 104A and 109 of the Copyright Act - is unconstitutional. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 6:18 pm by John Elwood
  And we will have to wait a while longer to know definitively whether the U.S. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 7:45 am by John Elwood
Amicus brief of Mothers Against Drunk Driving Amicus brief of Louisiana et al. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 3:18 pm by Kiera Flynn
Amicus brief of Mothers Against Drunk Driving Amicus brief of Louisiana et al. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 7:04 am by Lyle Denniston
  The case was Dallas County, et al., v. [read post]