Search for: "STATE V. BULLCOMING" Results 141 - 160 of 194
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jun 2011, 12:11 am by Evidence ProfBlogger
Wouldn’t you know it – a day after I post “an interesting Confrontation Clause case” decided by the Ninth Circuit (Ocampo), a highly anticipated United States Supreme Court opinion on the Confrontation Clause is issued – Bullcoming v. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 10:43 pm by Kali Borkoski
In its decision in Bullcoming v. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 10:27 pm
Yesterday, the United States Supreme Court announced its decision in Bullcoming v. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 6:37 pm by Zachary Spilman
While there is no shortage of folks willing to say that today’s SCOTUS opinion in Bullcoming v. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 5:13 pm by Brian Shiffrin
In Melendez-Diaz v Massachusetts (129 S.Ct. 2527 [June 25, 2009]), the United States Supreme Court held that the Confrontation Clause requires that in order for the prosecution to be able to introduce a forensic laboratory report at trial, the prosecutor must present a live witness to testify to the truth of the statements made in the report subject to cross-examination. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 1:33 pm by Kent Scheidegger
  For example, one study trying to determine the impact of Mapp v. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 8:03 am
Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg delivered the opinion of the Court except as to part IV and footnote 6 in Bullcoming v. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 12:40 pm by John Elwood
Massachusetts, 10-8835, which presents the Confrontation Clause at issue in Bullcoming v. [read post]
19 Jun 2011, 11:49 am by Dwight Sullivan
This week at the CCAs:  AFCCA will hear oral argument at 1000 tomorrow in United States v. [read post]
11 Jun 2011, 6:27 pm by Dwight Sullivan
  Meanwhile, the Supreme Court’s pending decision in Bullcoming v. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 6:02 am by John Elwood
United States, 10-8659, Garcia v. [read post]