Search for: "STATE v VISSER" Results 141 - 160 of 210
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
On 16 March 2022, the High Court of England and Wales handed down its judgment following the FRAND trial in InterDigital v Lenovo. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 1:49 am
 Later that same day the IPKat's benefactor Dirk Visser furnished a second English translation -- this time of another case that ran on much the same lines but was somewhat more complex. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 10:48 am
324/09 L’Oréal SA and others v eBay International AG and others. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 5:27 am
 The second is whether diverging legal frameworks between Member States hamper the principle of free movement of goods. [read post]
11 Feb 2021, 8:16 am by Vaishali Mittal (Anand and Anand)
 ******************************************* [1] Decision dated December 16, 2021 in IA 6441 of 2020 in InterDigital Technology Corporation & Ors v. [read post]
The Court’s approach to confidentiality Meade J began his analysis with a reminder of the key principles identified by the Court of Appeal in OnePlus v Mitsubishi ([2020] EWCA 1562). [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 3:19 am by Matthieu Dhenne (Ipsilon)
That said, as the Paris High Court stated, ASIs are justified in the presence of a contractual forum clause. [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 3:49 am by Rachel Mumby (Bristows)
A copy of the appeal judgment can be found here. [1]  We use the Neurim to refer to Neurim and its exclusive licensee, Flynn, unless otherwise stated. [read post]
24 Jan 2024, 3:40 am by Katie Cambrook (Bristows)
A copy of the judgment can be found here [1] C-130/11 [2] C-673/18 [3] Merck Sereno v Comptroller General of Patents [2023] EWHC 3240 (Ch) [4] C-61/79 More from our authors: Vissers Annotated European Patent Convention 2023 Edition by Kaisa Suominen, Nina Ferara, Peter de Lange, Andrew Rudge€ 105 Artificial Intelligence and Patents: An International Perspective on… [read post]
30 Aug 2021, 12:41 am by Brian Cordery (Bristows)
At the outset of the hearing the Judge stated that his objection in the BMS case was directed to a paper application for the listing of the trial being made when the scope of the trial and in particular that there was another action to be joined to it, was not fully appreciated. [read post]
2 Feb 2021, 8:04 am by Laurence Lai (Simmons & Simmons LLP)
In updated F-V, 3, the two steps taken by examiners to assess unity of invention, carried over from former F-V, 2, are broken down and explained in greater detail. [read post]
8 Dec 2023, 5:35 am by Ivo Emanuilov (KU Leuven)
The facts of the case On 21 November 2023, Sir Anthony Mann of the London High Court handed down a judgment in the case of Emotional Perception AI Ltd v Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks [2023] EWHC 2948 (Ch). [read post]
The five categories of green technologies listed by the BRPTO are: (i) alternative energies; (ii) transportation; (iii) energy conservation; (iv) waste management; and (v) sustainable agriculture. [read post]
If the latter, then this may be contrasted with the approach taken by Pumfrey J in Abbott v Ranbaxy [2004] where he stated that had he not granted summary judgment on validity grounds, he would have granted a preliminary injunction. [read post]