Search for: "STEVENS v. ROGERS" Results 141 - 160 of 322
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jun 2014, 7:51 am by Thomas Hopson
Rumsfeld, Rumsfeld v. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 5:34 am by Amy Howe
At ISCOTUSnow (video), Steven Heyman analyzes last week’s decision in Wood v. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 3:11 am by Amy Howe
California and United States v. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 6:19 am by Amy Howe
 Other commentary on the case comes from Roger Pilon at Cato at Liberty, Steven Mazie at The Economist’s Democracy in America blog, Andrew Suszek at more than twenty cents, and Bill Blum at truthdig. [read post]
21 Apr 2014, 6:26 am by Amy Howe
Briefly: Fortune’s Roger Parloff previews tomorrow’s oral argument in American Broadcasting Companies v. [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 8:56 am by library
  Two of the more notable features include Stevens holding a golf club to represent his majority opinion in PGA Tour, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Mar 2014, 5:56 am by Amy Howe
” Briefly: At Fortune, Roger Parloff previews next week’s oral arguments in Alice Corporation v. [read post]
26 Mar 2014, 1:37 am by Amy Howe
Hobby Lobby Stores and Conestoga Wood Specialties v. [read post]
17 Feb 2014, 7:31 am by David Markus
Stevens was seated next to the famed dancer and actress Ginger Rogers. [read post]
6 Feb 2014, 10:41 am by Robert Percival
Circuit unanimously dispatched all of the challenges in a per curiam opinion by Chief Judge Sentelle and Judges Rogers and Tatel. [read post]
29 Sep 2013, 7:54 pm by Steve Vladeck
Circuit (minus Judge Srinivasan) will confront in tomorrow’s oral argument in al Bahlul v. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 1:23 pm by Ilya Somin
They argue that this divide is exemplified by the the Supreme Court’s decision in NFIB v. [read post]
13 Sep 2013, 11:08 am by Kali Borkoski
Presenters will include Richard Falk, Roger Martella, Jr., and Kristen Nathanson. [read post]
28 Aug 2013, 9:30 am by azatty
Law Professors Toni Massaro and Barbara Atwood will speak on a panel with attorney Steven Phillips about the Supreme Court decisions in Windsor v. [read post]