Search for: "Samsung Electronics America, Inc" Results 141 - 160 of 259
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jun 2012, 4:31 pm by Eric Schweibenz
(collectively, “LG”) and respondents Samsung Electronics, Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung LED Co., Ltd., and Samsung LED America, Inc. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 5:34 pm by Eric Schweibenz
The complaint alleges that Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. of Korea, Samsung Electronics America, Inc. of Ridgefield Park, New Jersey, Samsung LED Co., Ltd. of Korea, and Samsung LED America, Inc. of Atlanta, Georgia (collectively, “Samsung”) unlawfully import into the U.S., sell for importation, sell within the U.S. after importation and/or offer to sell within the U.S. after importation… [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 3:40 pm by Eric Schweibenz
” According to Order No. 17, OSRAM sought an order compelling Respondents Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Electronics America, Inc. [read post]
3 May 2012, 2:45 pm by Eric Schweibenz
Patent Nos. 6,701,523 (the ‘523 patent), 6,898,762 (the ‘762 patent), 7,065,709 (the ‘709 patent), 7,103,906 (the ‘906 patent), 7,225,455 (the ‘455 patent), 7,493,643 (the ‘643 patent), and 8,112,776 (the ‘776 patent) (collectively, the “asserted patents”): LG Electronics, Inc. of South Korea LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc. of Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey Mitsubishi Electric Corp. of Japan Mitsubishi Electric US… [read post]
4 Jul 2021, 9:31 am by Florian Mueller
One of the ways in which he tries to optimize his workstream is that he takes a relatively long time to rule on--guess what--venue transfer motions.On Tuesday, the Federal Circuit handed down its decision In re.: Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.. [read post]
18 Feb 2018, 8:24 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
From the case: In running a particular advertisement without Vanna White's permission, defendants Samsung Electronics America, Inc. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 2:14 pm by Eric Schweibenz
According to the Notice of Investigation, the ITC has identified the following entities as the respondents in this investigation: AU Optronics Corp. of Taiwan AU Optronics Corporation America of Houston, Texas Acer America Corporation of San Jose, California Acer Inc. of Taiwan BenQ America Corp. of Irvine, California BenQ Corp. of Taiwan SANYO Electric Co., Ltd. of Japan SANYO North America Corporation of San Diego, California [read post]
30 Dec 2009, 4:36 pm by Eric Schweibenz
According to the Notice of Investigation, the Commission has identified Sharp Corporation of Japan, Sharp Electronics Corporation of Mahwah, New Jersey, and Sharp Electronics Manufacturing Company of America, Inc. of San Diego, California as respondents in this investigation. [read post]
28 Mar 2021, 2:11 am by Florian Mueller
"Samsung:"On information and belief, Samsung Electronics America, Inc. conducts business operations in the Western District of Texas in its facilities at 12100 Samsung Blvd., Austin, Texas 78754. [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 6:09 pm by Eric Schweibenz
  The Respondents in this investigation are:  Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.; Samsung Electronics America, Inc.; Samsung International, Inc.; Samsung Semiconductor, Inc.; Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC; Apple Inc.; AsusTek Computer, Inc.; Asus Computer International, Inc.; Hon Hai Precision Industry Co., Ltd.; Kingston Technology Co.,… [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 10:23 am
 Micron, together with Samsung Electronics Company, Ltd, Hynix Semiconductor, Inc., and Infineon Technologies of North America, controlled seventy-five percent of the worldwide market for these chips. [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 3:32 pm
(“Samsung”) alleging violation of Section 337 by Sharp Corporation, Sharp Electronics Corporation (“SEC”), and Sharp Electronics Manufacturing Company of America, Inc. [read post]
11 Aug 2010, 1:25 pm by WIMS
Distributors of Electronics Assoc.; Nemours Foundation; Premier, Inc.; Premier Farnell; Resource Media; Samsung; Sprout Creation; Stokes Lawrence; and Wells Fargo. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 11:26 am by Eric Schweibenz
  The original Respondents were Samsung Electronics Company, Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC (collectively, “Samsung”), LG Electronics, Inc., LG Electronics USA, Inc., and LG Electronics MobileComm USA, Inc. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 10:58 am by Will
Samsung Electronics America, Inc., 2010 WL 1220946 (3d Cir. [read post]