Search for: "Sanders v. Department of Justice"
Results 141 - 160
of 172
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Mar 2008, 12:31 pm
To date, no hearings have been held on the House version of the bill.DOJ's Objections to the LegislationTestifying on behalf of the Department of Justice, Michael F. [read post]
3 Nov 2023, 1:00 pm
It's a prosecutor-v. [read post]
15 Aug 2010, 6:52 am
Prior to this termination, we leased this facility (lease was due to expire August 2009) and the customer was the Texas Department of Criminal Justice. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 5:16 am
Bush administration’s Justice Department initially staked out the extreme position that Congress was disabled constitutionally from regulating “global war on terror” activities such as detention and interrogation, because these activities were akin to battlefield tactics. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 1:30 pm
” Justice Kavanaugh’s concurring opinion in NCAA v. [read post]
25 Mar 2008, 1:09 pm
Supreme Court, March 19, 2008 Snyder v. [read post]
1 Nov 2018, 4:35 pm
If you are at all interested in understanding the breadth and reach of the many canons of statutory interpretation, I recommend a book authored by the late Justice S [read post]
7 Aug 2023, 5:42 am
” Sanders v. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 10:03 am
Supreme Court in Decker v. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 11:06 am
Department of State, respectively: ? [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 8:03 am
KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services, Defendant. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 4:44 am
Bernie Sanders (D-VT). [read post]
22 Dec 2006, 2:16 pm
JUNE • Miranda v. [read post]
7 May 2010, 10:00 pm
Paul, Rust v. [read post]
24 Mar 2009, 1:02 am
Chief Justice John Roberts Jr. greeted her as she reached the lectern, telling her, "We wish you well. [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 4:03 pm
Steel Corp. v. [read post]
10 Nov 2023, 3:00 am
Democratic Plan to Subpoena Supreme Court Justices’ Allies Faces Pushback MSN – Ann Marimow (Washington Post) | Published: 11/8/2023 Democrats in Congress have tried unsuccessfully to press the Supreme Court to strengthen its ethics rules following revelations that some justices accepted and did not report free luxury travel, real estate deals, and gifts from wealthy benefactors. [read post]
11 Sep 2020, 12:27 pm
Today, Lochner v. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 2:43 pm
(Houseman v. [read post]
30 Aug 2022, 5:01 am
State and State v. [read post]
