Search for: "Santana v. State"
Results 141 - 160
of 193
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
The Second Circuit Weighs In On Tidal Wave Of Class Actions Under The Illinois Biometric Privacy Act
29 Nov 2017, 5:43 am
Court of Appeals to wade into the rising tide of litigation under the BIPA in Santana v. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 4:01 pm
See Flanagan v. [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 5:15 pm
State of Indiana (NFP) Steven Ray Santana v. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 5:45 am
Esperanza Andrade, in her official capacity as Secretary of State for the State of Texas v. [read post]
28 Oct 2013, 7:19 pm
United States, Berghuis v. [read post]
3 Oct 2014, 8:25 am
EEOC v. [read post]
19 Nov 2024, 12:50 pm
See Santana-Diaz v. [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 6:31 am
Young 13-95Issue: (1) Whether the state forfeits an argument that Stone v. [read post]
24 Feb 2025, 3:42 pm
Similarly, in Lopez v. [read post]
7 Nov 2016, 4:14 am
” At ACS, Sandra Park looks at Lynch v. [read post]
8 Mar 2016, 1:16 pm
” Finally, in Morales-Santana v. [read post]
9 Nov 2016, 11:17 am
Morales-Santana does not quite rise to the level of United States v. [read post]
26 Dec 2018, 6:00 am
In another big-rig accident case that settled for $3 million in 2018 (Medeiros v. [read post]
16 Nov 2016, 3:57 am
United States ex rel Rigsby, which involves the effect on a lawsuit under the False Claims Act of a violation of the act’s seal requirement, and Lynch v. [read post]
23 Oct 2013, 11:59 am
Young, 13-95 (asking whether a state can forfeit application of the Stone v. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 12:15 pm
Past participles like “owed” are routinely used as adjectives to describe the present state of a thing. [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 5:18 pm
[1] The quoted phrases are from the Third Circuit in Drax v. [read post]
1 Sep 2016, 3:22 pm
State Farm Fire and Casualty Co. v. [read post]
28 Jun 2016, 8:47 am
Hellerstedt, the Justices simply denied review on Tuesday of two other cases by states seeking to defend similar laws: a Mississippi case, Currier v. [read post]
11 Mar 2019, 9:01 pm
INS (2001), and United States v. [read post]
