Search for: "Seagate Technology"
Results 141 - 160
of 305
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Sep 2007, 2:17 pm
” The White House also expressed its approval for the Federal Circuit’s recent decision in In re Seagate Technology, which, in the administration’s words: “eliminated the ‘duty of care’ and held that enhanced damages are only appropriate where the infringer acts with reckless disregard of the patentee’s rights. [read post]
20 Aug 2007, 4:49 pm
The seven-year-old case, which hasn't gone to trial, pits an individual inventor and MIT against Seagate Technology. [read post]
6 Oct 2008, 9:55 pm
The defendant argued that after Seagate, opinion of counsel evidence was no longer relevant to the question of intent for inducing or contributory infringement. [read post]
27 Nov 2008, 4:07 am
Back it up Technology is awesome, but losing your data sucks. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 9:11 pm
Genentech, Inc., 549 U.S. 118 (2007) In re Seagate Technology, LLC, 497 F.3d 1360 (Fed. [read post]
23 May 2008, 5:54 pm
Members of CFR include: Apple, Autodesk, Business Software Alliance, Chevron, Cisco Systems, Comcast, Dell, Electrolux, Google, Hewlett-Packard Company, Information Technology Industry Council, Intel, Micron Technology Inc., Microsoft, Oracle, Palm Inc., RIM, SAP, Seagate Technology, Symantec, TechNet, Time Warner and Visa. [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 8:33 am
Clark, 111 U.S. 120 (1884), requires apportionment of patent damages to the inventive contribution of the claimed technology? [read post]
24 Aug 2007, 1:23 pm
The patent owner in In re Seagate Technology (Fed. [read post]
18 Oct 2012, 9:05 am
Here are the noteworthy trade secret, non-compete and cybersecurity stories from the past week, as well one or two that I missed over the past couple of weeks: Noteworthy Trade Secret and Non-Compete Posts and Cases: A Minnesota federal district court has vacated a $630.4 million judgment that had been leveled against disk drive maker Western Digital Corp. after rival Seagate Technologies accused Western Digital of misappropriating Seagate's confidential… [read post]
2 Apr 2009, 5:31 am
"We will consider acquiring technology that rounds out our core capabilities and integrates well with our technology," Guidance Software CEO Victor Limongelli said.... [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 8:48 am
” In re Seagate Technology, LLC, 497 F.3d 1360, 1371 (Fed. [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 1:51 pm
”In re Seagate Tech., LLC, 497 F.3d 1360, 1371(Fed. [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 8:49 am
In 2007, sitting en banc, it established a heightened standard for willfulness that included an inquiry into whether a defendant's actions were "objectively reckless" in In re Seagate Technology LLC. [read post]
20 Oct 2015, 10:00 pm
Currently, under the standard set out by the Federal Circuit in In re Seagate Technology LLC, an enhanced damages award under § 284 requires clear and convincing evidence that: (1) the infringer acted despite an objectively high likelihood that its actions constituted infringement of a valid patent, and (2) that this objectively-defined risk was either known or so obvious that it should have been known to the accused infringer. [read post]
10 Jan 2008, 3:18 am
The Court instructed the jury using the objective recklessness standard from In re Seagate Techs., LLC, 497 F.3d 1360 (Fed. [read post]
8 Jan 2008, 6:19 am
Prior to StoredIQ, Ferretti was vice president, channel sales for EVault, a Seagate Technology Company, where he managed reseller and system integrator sales for North America. [read post]
30 May 2010, 12:49 pm
In re Seagate Technology, LLC, 497 F.3d 1360 (Fed.Cir. 2007). [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 4:09 pm
By way of background, the Complainant in this investigation is Qimonda AG (“Qimonda”) and the Respondents are LSI Corporation, Seagate Technology, Seagate Technology (US) Holdings, Inc., Seagate Technology LLC, Seagate Memory Products (US) Corporation, and Seagate (US) LLC (collectively, “Respondents”). [read post]
4 Aug 2009, 1:51 pm
The USTPO faces a few major problems due to the increase in applications and complexity of technology. [read post]
13 May 2009, 6:31 am
McKelvie, Seagate Plus One: How the District Courts are Implementing Seagate; Seagate Plus One (Article)• Joseph Scott Miller, Testimony of Professor Joseph Scott Miller, Lewis & Clark Law School - Legal Doctrines That Affect the Value and Licensing of Patents (Panel 3)• Raymond Millien, The IP Marketplace Players• John A. [read post]
