Search for: "Seagate Technology" Results 141 - 160 of 305
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Feb 2011, 9:44 pm by Kelly
(PatLit) United States US General Public Knowledge tells USTR: Adopt a more rational trade policy (Public Knowledge) KEI comments on USTR 2011 Special 301 Review (KEI) Theft of trade secrets: pinning down a reasonable assessment of damage (IP finance) US Patent Reform House Subcommittee hearing on patent reform (Inventive Step) Judge Michel tells Congress Patent Office should keep fees, provides views from his days on bench (Maryland Intellectual Property Law Blog) Patent reform efforts target… [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 8:22 am by Two-Seventy-One Patent Blog
  Interestingly, when this decision is combined with Seagate, the effect of willfulness is more pronounced:Before Knorr-Bremse - 63.8%After Knorr-Bremse, but before Seagate - 48.2%After Seagate - 37.4%(3)  Seagate dramatically reduced findings of willfulness by a judge, but had no effect on jury findings.Before Seagate Jury - 60.2%After Seagate Jury - 61.9%Before Seagate Judge - 53.9%After Seagate Judge -… [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 7:48 am by Phil
• The New gTLDs • Trends in Patenting Nanotechnology & Green Technology The conference will take place in Arlington, Virginia on April 6-9, 2011. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 3:33 pm by Alex Gasser
  Accordingly, the Federal Circuit affirmed the ITC’s January 29, 2010 final determination in Investigation No. 337-TA-665, which found no violation of Section 337 by LSI Corporation, Seagate Technology, Seagate Technology (US) Holdings, Inc., Seagate Technology LLC, Seagate Memory Products (US) Corporation, and Seagate (US) with respect to Qimonda AG’s U.S. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 4:30 am by Dennis Crouch
Berry (Cooley) is researching how In re Seagate Technology, LLC, 497 F.3d 1360 (Fed. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 3:40 pm by Alex Gasser
By way of background, on November 20, 2008, Qimonda AG (“Qimonda”) filed a complaint with the ITC against LSI Corporation, Seagate Technology, Seagate Technology (US) Holdings, Inc., Seagate Technology LLC, Seagate Memory Products (US) Corporation, and Seagate (US) (collectively, “Respondents”) alleging violation of Section 337 by the importation, sale for importation, or sale after importation of chips… [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 3:30 am by Jason Rantanen
  "The objective baselessness standard for enhanced damages and attorneys’ fees against a non-prevailing plaintiff under Brooks Furniture is identical to the objective recklessness standard for enhanced damages and attorneys’ fees against an accused infringer for § 284 willful infringement actions under In re Seagate Technology, LLC, 497 F.3d 1360 (Fed. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 8:34 am by Alex Gasser
Inc. of City of Industry, California; • Giga-byte Technology Co., Ltd., of Taiwan; • Gracom Technologies LLC of City of Industry, California; • Hewlett-Packard Company of Palo Alto, California; • Hitachi Global Storage Technologies of San Jose, California; • Jaton Corporation of Fremont, California; • Jaton Technology TPE of Taiwan; • Micro-Star International Co., Ltd., of Taiwan;… [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 4:08 pm
" In re Seagate Tech., LLC, 497 F.3d 1360, 1371 (Fed. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 11:53 am by Jason Rantanen
The rule does not say anything about a particular hypothetical negotiation or reasonable royalty involving any particular technology, industry, or party. [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 9:03 pm by Patent Docs
Technology Transfer Tactics and Strafford will be offering a webinar/ teleconference entitled "Patent Infringement Claims, Opinions of Counsel and Attorney-Client Privilege" on January 5, 2011 from 1:00 - 2:30 PM (EST). [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 8:49 pm by Robert
  Think about the Wright brothers who stayed with wing warp technology long after it was clear the aileron, invented by someone else, was the superior invention for the future of aviation. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 9:06 pm by Eric Schweibenz
Inc. of City of Industry, California; Giga-Byte Technology Co., Ltd. of Taipei, Taiwan; Gracom Technologies LLC, of City of Industry, California; Hewlett-Packard Company of Palo Alto, California; Hitachi Global Storage Technologies, Inc. of San Jose, California; Jaton Corporation of Fremont, California; Jaton Technology TPE of Hsi-Chih, Taiwan; Micro-Star International Co., Ltd. of Taipei Hsien, Taiwan; MSI Computer Corporation of City of Industry, California;… [read post]
12 Nov 2010, 12:53 am by Kelly
Nahum (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) District Court Nevada: Online forum operator gets easy 47 USC 230 Win: Two Plus Two v. [read post]