Search for: "Sharpe v. Smith"
Results 141 - 160
of 317
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Aug 2015, 10:56 am
Today we have a guest post (her second - she's a glutton for punishment) from fellow Reed Smith associate Danielle Devens. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 9:07 am
On November 14, 2014, in Priests for Life v. [read post]
17 Jul 2015, 11:05 am
I’ve added some paragraph breaks and removed the footnotes (which are available in the PDF version), but otherwise this is as Judge Kozinski wrote it: While most prosecutors are fair and honest, a legal environment that tolerates sharp prosecutorial practices gives important and undeserved career advantages to prosecutors who are willing to step over the line, tempting others to do the same. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am
The first edition of the Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence [Manual] was published in 1994, a year after the Supreme Court delivered its opinion in Daubert. [read post]
“Copyright law serves public ends by providing individuals with an incentive to pursue private ones”
16 Mar 2015, 5:13 am
In US v. [read post]
1 Mar 2015, 4:18 pm
In contrast, on Free Dominion, the second and third defendants had a post entitled “6 ways Baglow v Smith helped save the Internets! [read post]
13 Jan 2015, 4:04 pm
We had posts about this decision from Gabrielle Guillemin and Graham Smith. [read post]
7 Jan 2015, 10:00 pm
Smith approved the ESI protocol from the FDIC and suggested the parties consider the use of predictive coding. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
Ellis v. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 3:05 am
The second session of the conference started with Christopher Sharp (Herbert Smith Freehills) taking up cudgels on behalf of the neglected, unloved subject of database right under the Database Directive. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 8:53 am
Smith, 132 S. [read post]
12 Oct 2014, 4:30 pm
Reed Elsevier UK Limited (T/A Lexisnexis), heard 7 July 2014 (Lewison, Macur and Sharp LJJ) Flood v Times Newspapers, heard 8 July 2014 (Sharp and Macur LJJ and Sir Timothy Lloyd). [read post]
5 Oct 2014, 11:22 pm
Reed Elsevier UK Limited (T/A Lexisnexis), heard 7 July 2014 (Lewison, Macur and Sharp LJJ) Flood v Times Newspapers, heard 8 July 2014 (Sharp and Macur LJJ and Sir Timothy Lloyd). [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 11:03 am
This is not a case where the state judges were confused about the law or overlooked key evidence, as in Taylor v. [read post]
23 Jul 2014, 12:45 pm
Over Google’s objections, in Equustek Solutions Inc. v. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
Smith & Nephew, 2005 WL 3470337, at *5 (M.D. [read post]
6 Jul 2014, 1:08 pm
" That is why a unanimous Supreme Court was able to declare, in the 1982 case of U.S. v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 3:11 am
” Also last Thursday, in McCullen v. [read post]
11 Jun 2014, 4:00 am
Harris and KBR v. [read post]
10 Apr 2014, 7:00 am
The resulting conversation dove deeply into key questions such as the relevance and fate of Smith v. [read post]
