Search for: "Shell, I. v. Shell, B." Results 141 - 160 of 259
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jul 2018, 6:14 pm by Stephen Page
In March I presented for Legawise at its annual family law conference in Brisbane. [read post]
24 Oct 2006, 9:37 pm
He went on to say: "Furthermore, although I had already done that in the course of the shelling itself over the radio, and afterwards I did it again in person, I feel the obligation to express my deepest sympathy to the families of those who were killed and wounded and the citizens of Dubrovnik for the pain and all the damage that was caused to them by the unit under my command". [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 5:20 am by Susan Brenner
Sood, supra (quoting Kansas Statutes § 21-3755(b)(1)(B) (emphasis in the original). [read post]
28 Dec 2016, 3:00 pm by familoo
I ploughed through to the end, like someone fishing through a bowl of pistachio shells hoping to find one last nut. [read post]
13 Apr 2018, 12:00 pm by Hayley Evans
To that end, practices like those espoused in Pentagon policy, requiring autonomous and semi-autonomous weapons systems to undergo “rigorous hardware and software verification and validation (V&V) and realistic system developmental and operational test and evaluation (T&E),” can help reduce the risk of unintended combat engagements. [read post]
9 Aug 2021, 9:05 pm by Dan Flynn
With respect to land and facilities under his or her authority, exercise the functions delegated to the Secretary by Executive Order 12580, 3 CFR, 1987 Comp., p. 193, under the following provisions of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (“the Act”), as amended: (i) Sections 104 (a), (b), and (c)(4) of the Act (42 U.S.C. 9604 (a), (b), and (c)(4)), with respect to removal and remedial actions in the event of release… [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 2:06 am
Shell Oil Co., 2 Cal.3d 245, 251 (1970). [read post]
The Supreme Court disagreed, holding that “there is nothing special or conclusive about the bare parent/subsidiary relationship… the general principles which determine whether A owes a duty of care to C in respect of the harmful activities of B are not novel at all”. [read post]