Search for: "Shields v. United States"
Results 141 - 160
of 2,122
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Feb 2008, 1:23 am
The three United States patents at issue, which cover syringes having needle shield safety devices and may be used with pre-filled pharmaceutical injection syringes, are owned by Saftey Syringes, Inc. [read post]
13 Mar 2018, 6:37 am
United States, is misplaced. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 2:41 pm
(Eugene Volokh) From United States v. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 8:18 am
The dissent cited to United States v. [read post]
9 Oct 2007, 12:53 pm
United States v. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 11:59 am
" Biden v. [read post]
14 Jun 2018, 3:22 pm
The case was then appealed to the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
14 Jun 2018, 3:22 pm
The case was then appealed to the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 6:15 am
Alvarez: Trademark Dilution and the First AmendmentEarlier this week, the United States Supreme Court handed down its opinion on the Stolen Valor Act (18 U.S.C. [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 11:49 am
Under the CTA, most entities will be required to disclose detailed information about their beneficial owners to the United States Department of Treasury Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (“FinCEN”). [read post]
21 Dec 2007, 6:36 am
United States v. [read post]
20 Dec 2006, 4:34 am
BNA's United States Law Week reported in Vol. 75, No. 22 (Dec. 12, 2006) on the case Burr & Forman v. [read post]
13 May 2022, 4:41 am
All federal judges take an oath to administer justice under the Constitution and laws of the United States. [read post]
17 Jan 2025, 5:48 am
The plaintiffs in this lawsuit, Amal Gaza, et al v. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 9:12 am
In her 19-page decision in Greater Los Angeles Agency on Deafness et al. v. [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 6:26 am
See United States v. [read post]
Supreme Court Grants Extra Rapid Review In Texas Abortion Cases, But Postpones Granting Interim Stay
22 Oct 2021, 12:16 pm
Also today, the Court acted in United States v. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 2:47 am
Wider Implications The proceedings in Hook v British Airways and Stott v Thomas Cook have already attracted significant attention from the Equality and Human Rights Commission; with the Secretary of State acting as a further intervener. [read post]
11 Mar 2009, 6:06 am
United States v. [read post]
3 Apr 2010, 7:20 am
United States v. [read post]
