Search for: "Small v. Going Forward, Inc." Results 141 - 160 of 437
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jan 2019, 6:51 pm
Lambert spoke to the issue of division of authority over the machinery of politics in the United States; those insights and perspectives may be useful going forward in considering the division of authority among the political and judicial branches over governance modalities that the American founding generation might not have recognized. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 2:35 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Supreme Court issued its unanimous decision in Cyan, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 3:03 am by Ben
It was going to be an Act that grew and developed as the year went on. [read post]
11 Dec 2018, 11:18 am by Howard Knopf
Blacklock’s won a Small Claims Court victory in 2015 against the Canadian Vintners Association for $11,470 plus punitive damages of $2,000 plus costs in a judgment that was clearly wrongly decidedbut not appealed for obvious practical reasons – and which was, in any event, of virtually no precedential value, being a Small Claims Court decision.On November 10, 2016 Blacklock’s badly lost its first and thus far only Federal Court trial – the substantive result… [read post]
17 Oct 2018, 3:59 am
FI, a relatively small premium clothing company, owned registrations for LNDR for clothing. [read post]
23 Aug 2018, 6:52 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  However, an employer’s ability to require non-disclosure of such agreements may become significantly more limited going forward, depending on the jurisdiction. [read post]
31 Jul 2018, 10:40 am by Kevin Kaufman
Some of the traditional engines of economic activity in Connecticut are slowing, and in some cases businesses and individuals are going elsewhere. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 1:20 am by Kevin LaCroix
As the authors note, the decision has important implications for companies and their D&O insurers, as well as for claims going forward. [read post]
4 Apr 2018, 7:50 am by Guest Bloggers
Bruce Church, Inc., 397 U.S. 137 (1970), should replace the physical presence rule going forward. [read post]