Search for: "Smith v. Gaines" Results 141 - 160 of 816
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 May 2021, 4:00 am by Ian Mackenzie
Myers, Ontario Superior Court of Justice in Arconti v. [read post]
14 Apr 2021, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
Over-vigorous application of a statutory offence might be greeted in similar terms to those employed by the Lord Chief Justice in the Twitter Joke Trial case (Chambers v DPP), an appeal from conviction under s.127 of the Communications Act 2003: “The 2003 Act did not create some newly minted interference with the first of President Roosevelt’s essential freedoms – freedom of speech and expression. [read post]
21 Mar 2021, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
Smith, which is the decision that religious actors seized upon to secure a right to be above the law. [read post]
18 Mar 2021, 10:28 am by Richard Hunt
The Eighth Circuit had the same question in Smith v. [read post]
12 Mar 2021, 4:48 pm by INFORRM
Dr Robin Callender Smith is Honorary Professor of Media Law at Queen Mary, University of London’s Centre for Commercial Law Studies. [read post]
16 Feb 2021, 8:49 am by Eugene Volokh
I will largely leave to others prescriptions about what is to be done; but I hope my analysis might help us think through such matters. [1] See, e.g., Doe v. [read post]
18 Jan 2021, 8:15 am by Steve Gottlieb
Smith English only Environment Environment Environmental justice epidemics Epperson v. [read post]
23 Dec 2020, 5:31 am by Annsley Merelle Ward
The starters (1) Interim injunction surprise In Neurim v Mylan [2020] EWHC 1362 (Pat), Marcus Smith J ruled on the claimants’ application for a prohibitory injunction. [read post]
20 Dec 2020, 5:38 am by Robert Chesney
(v) Capabilities have been established to train cyber operations personnel, test cyber capabilities, and rehearse cyber missions. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 4:38 pm by David Greene
The American version of this knowledge-based “distributor” liability is commonly associated with the US Supreme Court’s 1959 decision in Smith v. [read post]
8 Oct 2020, 1:09 pm by Shannon Hill
Senate adopted a unanimous resolution in March 2015 which states, among other things, that the IoT “has the potential to generate trillions of dollars in economic opportunity” and that the United States should “develop a strategy to incentivize development of the IoT for connected technologies to empower consumers, foster future economic growth, and improve collective social well-being…” If these and similar efforts gain traction in today’s market, the… [read post]