Search for: "Smith v. Smith (1969)" Results 141 - 160 of 184
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Oct 2018, 6:05 am by Larry Tolchinsky
Smith-Snagg, 793 So. 2d 1000 (Fla. [read post]
4 Aug 2019, 1:26 pm by Bill Marler
Thanks to the New York Times and Matt Richtel for “Tainted Pork, Ill Consumers and an Investigation Thwarted. [read post]
11 May 2020, 8:07 am by Dan Maurer
From 1969 to 1987, American military commanders could prosecute UCMJ offenses only when the circumstances of the case demonstrated some nexus to military affairs. [read post]
25 Apr 2017, 1:12 pm by Chris Castle
 All of the proxies started dancing (you can find most of them on the venerable Google Shill List from the Oracle v. [read post]
16 Nov 2018, 8:00 am by Adam Faderewski
He served as a justice on the Supreme Court of Texas from 1949 to 1968, as a special judge on the Texas Criminal Court of Appeals in 1969, and was assistant attorney general of Texas from 1969 to 1971. [read post]
29 Jan 2021, 11:21 am by David Greene
Supreme Court upheld the rule in 1969 in a case called Red Lion Broadcasting v. [read post]
4 Aug 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
This post was prepared for a roundtable on Wrestling with Religious Diversity, convened as part of LevinsonFest 2022—a year-long series gathering scholars from diverse disciplines and viewpoints to reflect on Sandy Levinson’s influential work in constitutional law. [read post]
27 Dec 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
I relied in part on an anecdote involving a visit by Justice Scalia to the University of Texas and and his clear lack of interest in what his friend and former colleague Doug Laycock planned to publish in the Supreme Court Review about his opinion in the “peyote case,” Smith v. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 3:06 pm by Aaron Moss
Likewise, while the original 1928 Charlie Chaplin silent comedy The Circus will enter the public domain in 2024, the film was re-released in 1969 with a new score by Chaplin, and that version is still protected. [read post]
8 Jul 2020, 11:17 pm by Schachtman
He later served as an official on pollution control until 1969.[8] While at the New York Department of Labor, contributed widely to scientific publications on occupational health,[9] as did many other scientists under his supervision.[10] Omission of material facts seems to be a key aspect of the faux historian’s methodology [read post]