Search for: "Smith v. Standard Life" Results 141 - 160 of 798
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Mar 2015, 9:07 am by Eric Goldman
Ozimals * 17 USC 512(f) Claim Against “Twilight” Studio Survives Motion to Dismiss–Smith v. [read post]
23 Aug 2019, 3:36 am by SHG
The second is to live the rest of their life as a person without that body part. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
Rix LJ also referred to the distinction drawn by Baroness Hale in Majrowski v Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Trust [2006] UKHL 34, [2007] 1 AC 224 between “the ordinary banter and badinage of life and genuinely offensive and unacceptable behaviour”. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 6:08 am by Cari Rincker
  For example, the wife was awarded durational maintenance in Smith v. [read post]
7 May 2015, 3:40 pm by Cindy Cohn and Hanni Fakhoury
The court relied on the Supreme Court’s 1979 decision in Smith v. [read post]
30 Aug 2010, 6:20 pm
Stokes & Smith Co., 329 U.S. 637, 643 (1947). [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 4:59 pm by INFORRM
They are responsible for the editorial and corporate culture that wrecked Danielle Hindley’s life. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 10:00 am by Eric Goldman
Ozimals * 17 USC 512(f) Claim Against “Twilight” Studio Survives Motion to Dismiss–Smith v. [read post]
14 Sep 2016, 8:03 am by Eric Baxter
Smith did modify – without overruling – the Warren Court’s Sherbert v. [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 9:53 am by MOTP
Those hours multiplied by his standard hourly rate equals between $322,500 and $400,000, so he testified that a reasonable and necessary fee would be between $300,000 and $400,000. [read post]