Search for: "South Dakota v. Robert"
Results 141 - 160
of 246
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jan 2017, 9:01 am
In Planned Parenthood Minnesota, North Dakota, South Dakota v. [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 1:27 pm
Farm Bureau Fed'n v. [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 1:27 pm
Farm Bureau Fed'n v. [read post]
14 Dec 2016, 12:23 pm
In Galarza v. [read post]
13 Dec 2016, 9:01 pm
Dorf is the Robert S. [read post]
17 Nov 2016, 4:13 am
Department of Agriculture decision designating part of a South Dakota property owner’s farm as wetlands; though he argues that overreaching “by the USDA in Swampbuster and wetlands decision and rulemaking is a genuine issue,” he predicts that the court will decline to hear this case. [read post]
30 Jun 2016, 9:01 pm
While there is a so-called “political question” doctrine, first established in Luther v. [read post]
7 Jun 2016, 8:10 pm
Berg, but the South Dakota federal court did not award damages. [read post]
12 May 2016, 7:36 am
In this case, Johnson & Johnson was ordered to pay a total of $55 million to Gloria Ristesund of South Dakota. [read post]
12 May 2016, 7:36 am
In this case, Johnson & Johnson was ordered to pay a total of $55 million to Gloria Ristesund of South Dakota. [read post]
12 May 2016, 7:36 am
In this case, Johnson & Johnson was ordered to pay a total of $55 million to Gloria Ristesund of South Dakota. [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 12:49 pm
That would leave the rather bizarre effect that the mandate was in effect in much of the nation, but not in the seven states that are located in the Eighth Circuit: Arkansas, Iowa, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, and North and South Dakota. [read post]
30 Dec 2015, 7:28 pm
On the eve of its effective date, a North Dakota federal court issued a preliminary injunction to temporarily prevent the Rule from going into effect in the 13 states involved in the North Dakota litigation. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 1:25 pm
Robert Lewis Seigle, P.C., 751 A.2d 1182, 1185 (Pa. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 3:25 pm
By Robert G. [read post]
18 Oct 2015, 3:49 pm
Hilde v. [read post]
5 Aug 2015, 10:02 pm
” In The Economist, Steven Mazie looks at a recent decision by the Eighth Circuit holding that a North Dakota law which prohibited abortion after a fetal heartbeat is detected is unconstitutional, noting that it “closed with a five-page lament: North Dakota’s law may be inconsistent with Roe v Wade and Casey v Planned Parenthood, but the Supreme Court should ‘re-evaluate its jurisprudence. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 12:21 pm
The denial of review in Kobach v. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 4:00 am
Rychlak, 2015).Robert A. [read post]
10 Mar 2015, 9:01 pm
One difficulty is that, as the Supreme Court stated in the 1987 case of South Dakota v. [read post]
