Search for: "State of Maine v. Wing"
Results 141 - 160
of 219
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Feb 2014, 9:53 am
For instance, back in 1985, Robert Levinson complained of a contract with the Eckerd Foundation for the management of the Okeechobee School for Boys in which “[v]irtually every” contract item concerned input activities and pertained to administrative/operational functions. [read post]
23 Dec 2013, 9:01 pm
In State v. [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 5:30 am
Fla. 1988); United States v. [read post]
26 Sep 2013, 8:00 am
In one precedent, the Supreme Court ruled in Marsh v. [read post]
13 Sep 2013, 2:21 pm
Perry and United States v. [read post]
18 Jul 2013, 10:27 am
Their main purpose is political. [read post]
22 Jun 2013, 7:02 am
For example, the Military Commissions Act of 2009,1 which completely overhauled the Guantánamo Bay military commissions, was passed as Title XVIII of the 2010 NDAA.2 Likewise, the 2011–2013 NDAAs’ detention provisions—the main subject of this book—generated far more controversy and attention than the surrounding thousands of pages of appropriations provisions. [read post]
24 May 2013, 7:19 am
At View from the Wing, Eric M. [read post]
10 May 2013, 1:35 pm
Question: You portray the other wing of the Court as the “moderate-liberal” wing. [read post]
26 Feb 2013, 8:42 am
Lipset Political Man v. 133 Fascist ideology, though antiliberal in its glorification of the state, has been similar to liberalism in its opposition to big business, trade-unions, and the socialist state.... 1961 H. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 7:54 am
Maybe… The age of drugs / Dalrymple (Illus. in: Puck, v. 48, no. 1231 (1900 October 10), centerfold). [read post]
29 Jan 2013, 7:40 am
to my main beliefs and that may seem surprising to people who know me. [read post]
25 Dec 2012, 9:01 pm
Heller in 2008, and McDonald v. [read post]
26 Nov 2012, 1:30 am
He clearly and explicitly stated that outright withdrawal from the Convention was one of the options he was considering – the first time I have heard a sitting Lord Chancellor float this possibility. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 11:19 am
And the second was important, but hardly the main event. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 5:30 am
§3050(a.4)(4)(v). [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 9:19 am
” And even as far back as Gibbons v. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 4:38 am
The Expansion of 'Medicaid' under the ACA is Unconstitutional26 states challenged the provisions of the ACA that dealt with the Medicaid programme and one of the main reasons was the impact it would have on the federal funding they would receive under it. [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 10:40 am
These regulations treat state office digital campaign materials in the same manner as traditional campaign materials and do not put any extra burdens on candidates and their campaigns.In 2011, the judiciary flexed its social media wings in Griffin v. [read post]
27 May 2012, 8:23 am
Jaguar Shoes v Jaguar Cars: Blame It On The Lawyers! [read post]
