Search for: "State v. A.C."
Results 141 - 160
of 214
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Dec 2011, 4:22 am
Pierre v. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 10:17 am
Pritchard (1998), ‘United States v. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 2:48 pm
Div. 1993), even if the test constitutes only a “minimal intrusion,” State v. [read post]
5 Nov 2011, 11:46 am
Finsbury Borough Council. [1952] A.C. 109/132. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 5:18 am
Pesca, 298 AD2d at 292; Suwareh v State of New York, 24 AD3d 380 [2005]), or preventing himself from being struck by a falling object (see e.g. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 10:00 pm
Ltd. [1951] A.C. 297) . [read post]
9 Oct 2011, 12:14 pm
v. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 9:06 pm
Cir. 2005), reversed, 550 U.S. 398 (2007); A.C. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 10:00 pm
R (on the application of S) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWHC 2120 (Admin) - read judgment The High Court has found that the Secretary of State unlawfully detained a mentally ill foreign national who was awaiting deportation. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 11:05 am
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 12:50 pm
Mohindroo v. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 2:26 am
V. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 7:20 am
Before Donoghue v. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 8:30 am
In this week’s case (Morris v. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 3:25 am
Songs Ltd and others v Amstrad Consumer Electronics Plc [1988] 1 A.C. 1013, when the sale of tape-to-tape recording machines was not regarded as "authorising" infringement of the music copied by them since the company that made and sold the machines had not acted as though it had an entitlement to permit infringing acts by those machines' users. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 10:06 am
Learned counsel for the petitioner stated that prayer (a) which seeks overruling or setting aside of the judgment already passed in Mr X v. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 7:53 am
Nature of Concessions made in a Court of Law:In Jamilabai Abdul Kadar v Shankarlal Gulabchand andOrs. (30.04.1975), a three judge Bench consisting of A.C. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 7:53 am
Nature of Concessions made in a Court of Law:In Jamilabai Abdul Kadar v Shankarlal Gulabchand andOrs. (30.04.1975), a three judge Bench consisting of A.C. [read post]
5 Jun 2011, 1:42 pm
Div’n of Youth & Family Servs. v. [read post]
12 May 2011, 5:54 am
If so apply “the ultimate balancing test” which has four elements identified by Lord Steyn (in Re S (A Child) (Identification: Restrictions on Publication) [2005] 1 A.C. 593 at para 17): “First, neither article [8 or 10] has as such precedence over the other. [read post]
