Search for: "State v. Baros"
Results 141 - 160
of 193
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jun 2010, 8:03 pm
(IP:JUR) Overheated dairy warriors back in court: JN Dairies Ltd v Johal Dairies Ltd, Gurbir Singh (IPKat) The lady vanishes: the case of the disappearing debutante - IP Minister Baroness Wilcox (IPKat) INTELLIGENT SENSOR: a borderline rejection (Class 46) Sir Robin Jacob – Sir Hugh Laddie Chair in Intellectual Property Law, University College London (Spicy IP) (IPKat) United States US General US ITC holds second unnecessary hearing on China IP… [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 10:00 am
The apparent contradiction within the House of Lords’ decision might be explained by the numerous Turkish cases they cite: Karaduman v Turkey (1993) 74 DR 93, Kalaç v Turkey (1997) 27 EHRR 552, and most importantly, Sahin v Turkey (2005) 41 EHRR 8, which was heard before the ECtHR. [read post]
24 May 2010, 10:49 pm
(IP finance) Withdrawing patent applications – a matter of priority (IPKat) United States US General U.S. [read post]
13 Jan 2013, 4:09 pm
Discussion, research & resources Text and video from Baroness Onora O’Neill’s speech at UCL, 28 November 2011 – “Media Freedoms & Media Standards”. 5RB has uploaded its 1000th case report to its website case library. [read post]
5 Feb 2016, 8:30 am
’ The Rt Hon Sir Jack Beatson FBA, ‘The New Model Judiciary and the Other Two Branches of State’ The Hon Justice Mark Leeming, ‘Ministerial Override Certificates and the Law/Fact Distinction – A Comparison Between Australia and the United Kingdom’ Philip Cayford QC, ‘Wyatt v Vince – Climate Change in the Family Division? [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 7:30 pm
Meanwhile, PCC Chair Baroness Buscombe gave a speech to the Westminster Media Forum on regulating privacy and online media, defending the role of the PCC in general and its privacy decisions in particular. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 10:45 pm
Baroness Ruth Deech, the Chair of the Bar Standards Board and an expert on family law, recently questioned whether marriage rules are compatible with human rights law. [read post]
3 May 2018, 4:42 pm
Most authoritatively, the CJEU in L’Oreal v eBay states that a host that has acted non-neutrally in relation to certain data cannot rely on the hosting protection in the case of those data (judgment, para [116]). [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 10:40 pm
I will begin by summarising the present state of that law. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 10:58 pm
Thus, for example, in Jameel v Wall Street Journal Europe SPRL ([2007] 1 AC 359) Baroness Hale argued that the public have a right to know only if there is “a real public interest in communicating and receiving the information. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 5:29 am
United States, 597 F. [read post]
28 May 2024, 11:38 am
On 21 May 2024, judgment was handed down in R (On the application of National Council for Civil Liberties) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2024] EWHC 1181 (Admin). [read post]
13 Jan 2024, 4:31 pm
United StatesUnited States v. [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 5:27 pm
[Week commencing 13 August] Full Fact v Evening Standard, Clause 1, 17/08/2012; Joseph Horner v The Observer, Clause 1, 16/08/2012; Mr Christopher Mackin v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 15/08/2012; Jane Hughes v The Independent on Sunday, Clause 1, 15/08/2012; Dr Yannis Alexandrides v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 15/08/2012; Mr Oliver Gray v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 15/08/2012; Alex Jarvis v Daily Mail, Clauses 3, 5, 15/08/2012; Inspired Thinking Group… [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 2:28 pm
The Secretary of States submissions in Nzolameso, endorsed by Baroness Hale, stressed: that the sending authority must address its mind to, amongst other matters, the need to minimise educational disruption, and must record its reasoning, and be in a position to provide evidence of its contemporary reasoning in court, if called upon to do so. [read post]
1 Sep 2014, 12:49 am
See paragraph 13(a) of my decision in RJ v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2012] AACR 28. [read post]
4 Dec 2022, 3:30 am
David Allen Green, The Law and Policy Blog: The secularisation of the United Kingdom state: concluding, “Let us put disestablishment off to another year. [read post]
23 Dec 2022, 12:14 am
” It appears that the Crown Prosecution Service commented that the Bible contains references “which are simply no longer appropriate in modern society and which would be deemed offensive if stated in public”. [read post]
6 Nov 2016, 4:14 pm
Legislation providing for partial implemention of section 40 has already won the support of the House of Lords after Baroness Hollins put through an amendment to the investigatory powers bill, which would bring about cost protection for the victims of phone hacking. [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 4:20 pm
We have had previous posts on the cases of Robins v Kordowski [2011] EWHC 981 (QB)) (seehere), Awdry, Bailey and Douglas v Kordowksi, Farrall v Kordowksi [2010] EWHC 2436 (QB) (see here), Phillips v Kordowski and Mazzola v Kordowski. [read post]
