Search for: "State v. Borden"
Results 141 - 160
of 177
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Mar 2011, 9:57 am
BORDEN, JR. [read post]
10 Apr 2007, 10:15 am
Borden, 7How. 1 (1849), when they ask for an advisory opinion, Hayburn’s Case, 2Dall. 409 (1792), see also Clinton v. [read post]
2 Apr 2018, 6:40 am
Ltd. v. [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 8:05 am
Ltd. v. [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 12:01 pm
Borden , No. 08-1625 Sentence for drug crimes is affirmed where the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying defendant a sentence reduction where: 1) defendant's sentence was appropriate based upon his extensive criminal history and the need to protect society; and 2) the court did not erroneously rely upon its earlier decision not to resentence defendant as a the basis for the present denial. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 3:51 am
(IP finance) The UK IP Office issues a Virgin trademark ruling that contrasts the Israel approach (IP Factor) EWHC (Pat): Article 27 (to prevent parallel proceedings in different member states) requires flexible approach to meaning of ‘same parties’: Mölnlycke Health Care AB (MAB), Mölnlycke Health care Limited (MUK) v. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 3:00 am
(Spicy IP) Design v copyright: need for a clear and rational distinction: Microfibres v Giridhar & Co & Ors (Spicy IP) Madras High Court: jurisdiction - can design infringement case can be filed in Court where plaintiff resides? [read post]
3 Jan 2024, 7:15 am
State v. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 4:39 pm
McKenna: we can’t really mean that a state of uncertainty is actionable—if we did, “I don’t know whether X makes this” would be actionable/part of the “confused” group. [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 8:00 am
See Hall v. [read post]
30 Jun 2019, 8:24 pm
The gage and emblem of this freedom is the sovereign state. [read post]
17 May 2015, 1:08 am
Three lemons: bad newsfor passing-off plaintiffsThe question to be decided at appeal was whether this reputation among a significant section of the public in the UK, in the absence of goodwill, was enough to form the basis of a successful passing off action where the remaining requirements of misrepresentation and damage in the classic Reckitt & Colman Products Ltd v Borden Inc [1990] 1 WLR 491 ‘Jif Lemon’ trinity of criteria were satisfied. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 6:29 am
Borden Chemical Co., New Jersey Superior Court, Law Div. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 8:31 am
Introduction What is the proper scope of state power and its agent the public lawyer in Criminal law? [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 8:31 am
Introduction What is the proper scope of state power and its agent the public lawyer in Criminal law? [read post]
22 Aug 2008, 11:11 pm
Klein, PRIORITY OF STATE LAW POSSESSORY LIENS OVER PERFECTED SECURITY INTERESTS: IN RE BORDEN, 26-OCT Am. [read post]
8 Oct 2021, 4:01 am
In doing so, the court placed emphasis on the position under English law as emphasized in Payton v Snelling,[2] Lampard; Reckitt & Colman v Borden;[3] and Pasquali Cigarette Co Ltd v Diaconicolas & Capsopolus.[4] The first and foremost factor, as the court stressed, would be to identify the features in the plaintiff’s product that are distinctive to him or her. [read post]
15 May 2019, 9:10 am
Defendant/Owen filed for a motion to dismiss, claiming that under Borden v. [read post]
25 Jan 2019, 9:57 am
M.H. v. [read post]
25 Jan 2019, 9:57 am
M.H. v. [read post]
