Search for: "State v. Brennan"
Results 141 - 160
of 1,429
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Sep 2022, 9:01 pm
Maryland, Martin v. [read post]
2 Sep 2022, 5:01 am
That three-Justice opinion (written by Justice Brennan and joined by Justices Marshall and Stevens) stressed that the tax exemption was not a permissible accommodation of religion, because it "burdens nonbeneficiaries markedly"[14] "by increasing their tax bills by whatever amount is needed to offset the benefit bestowed on subscribers to religious publications. [read post]
21 Aug 2022, 5:06 am
In National Assn of Broadcasters v. [read post]
17 Aug 2022, 12:51 pm
No. 4J, 301 Or. 358 (1986), appeal dismissed for want of substantial federal question, 480 U.S. 942 (1987) (over the dissenting votes of Brennan, Marshall, & O'Connor, JJ.); United States v. [read post]
9 Aug 2022, 6:03 am
Plaintiffs rely heavily on the plurality opinion of Justice Brennan in Board of Ed. v. [read post]
8 Aug 2022, 3:00 am
See, e.g., State v. [read post]
4 Aug 2022, 10:53 am
In Brennan v. [read post]
3 Aug 2022, 6:30 am
Becerra (2018) (dealing with compelled speech regarding abortion), and Janus v. [read post]
2 Aug 2022, 9:01 pm
In Bostock v. [read post]
31 Jul 2022, 9:01 pm
Chris v. [read post]
30 Jul 2022, 6:49 am
Brennan v. [read post]
29 Jul 2022, 4:10 am
Auth., 182 AD3d 970, 971; Matter of Brennan v New York State Dept. of Health, 159 AD3d 1250, 1252; Matter of Trotman v New York State Cts., 117 AD3d 1164, 1165; Matter of Littles v New York State Dept. of Corrections, 61 AD3d 1266, 1268; Matter of Cushion v Brooklyn Botanic Garden, 46 AD3d 1095, 1096; cf. [read post]
28 Jul 2022, 1:26 pm
Harper (concerning the controversial “independent state legislature” theory of election law), United States v. [read post]
28 Jul 2022, 12:33 pm
This drawing is from oral arguments in Printz v. [read post]
21 Jul 2022, 9:05 pm
Although the Supreme Court ruled DOMA unconstitutional in United States v. [read post]
20 Jul 2022, 7:37 pm
Ring up one more United States v. [read post]
19 Jul 2022, 2:59 pm
., Sarafin v. [read post]
17 Jul 2022, 9:05 pm
”[15] The purpose of a restatement is to clarify “the underlying principles of the common law” that have “become obscured by the ever-growing mass of decisions in the many different jurisdictions, state and federal, within the United States. [read post]
13 Jul 2022, 7:04 am
United States, 561 U.S. 358, 405-11 (2010); McCulloch v. [read post]
10 Jul 2022, 6:30 am
Bickel trusted the Court to discern our deepest “fundamental values,” such as a commitment to racial justice that required the invalidation of segregation in Brown v. [read post]
