Search for: "State v. Charlie" Results 141 - 160 of 692
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jun 2018, 9:00 am by Josh Blackman
Charlie Savage notes that this argument evades a “novel legal question. [read post]
6 Jun 2018, 8:36 am by Elizabeth Clark
Quoting West Virginia Board of Education v. [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 12:55 pm by Tammy Binford
Source: AmberLaneRoberts / iStock / Getty The Court’s June 4 ruling in Masterpiece Cakeshop, Ltd. v. [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 12:55 pm by Tammy Binford
Source: AmberLaneRoberts / iStock / Getty The Court’s June 4 ruling in Masterpiece Cakeshop, Ltd. v. [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 10:13 am by Sherrilyn Ifill
However, the court also stressed that Phillips’ refusal to serve Charlie Craig and David Mullins occurred before the Supreme Court recognized the constitutional right of same-sex couples to marry in United States v. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 1:25 pm by Eugene Volokh
I think that it's hard to make much of these statements by themselves; they simply reflect the Court's holding in Employment Division v. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 12:49 pm by Mark Walsh
(The first was on April 24, with two related patent decisions, one announced by Thomas, in Oil States Energy Services LLC v. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 6:50 am by Smith Eibeler LLC
The United States Supreme Court has ruled against a gay couple in favor of a Colorado baker who refused to bake a wedding cake for their wedding in the case Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
2 Jun 2018, 6:27 am by Andrew Delaney
Schenk, 2018 VT 45By Charlie ButtreyWriting for the majority in the 2012 case United States v. [read post]
16 Mar 2018, 4:00 am by J. Francisco Lobo
Among them are Charlie Dunlap’s post on his blog Lawfire and Masahiro Kurosaki’s recent post on Lawfare. [read post]
4 Mar 2018, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
Following Justice Minister Charlie Flanagan’s comments on surveillance laws, the Times [£] uses the statements as an opportunity to discuss the current state of legislation. [read post]
“The regulatory history of the HIPAA demonstrates that neither HIPAA nor its implementing regulations were intended to preempt tort actions under state law arising out of the unauthorized release of a plaintiff’s medical records,” Justice Flemming Norcott wrote for a unanimous court in Byrne v. [read post]
“The regulatory history of the HIPAA demonstrates that neither HIPAA nor its implementing regulations were intended to preempt tort actions under state law arising out of the unauthorized release of a plaintiff’s medical records,” Justice Flemming Norcott wrote for a unanimous court in Byrne v. [read post]