Search for: "State v. Covington" Results 141 - 160 of 339
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Feb 2011, 6:06 pm by Law Lady
 Billing Fraud: VIRGINIA FEDERAL JUDGE WON'T DISMISS MEDICARE FRAUD DEFENDANTS, United States v. [read post]
25 Feb 2012, 4:00 am
Supreme Court's taken up the treaty a number of times, among them in Medellín v. [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 2:30 pm
City of Milwaukee, a 2017 lawsuit brought by the ACLU and the law firm of Covington & Burling LLP on behalf of Black and Latino people, including a military veteran, a grandmother, students, and a state legislator. [read post]
17 Nov 2018, 12:10 pm by Schachtman
Indeed, their brief in other places states their opinion that significance testing is not necessary at all: “Testing for significance, however, is often mistaken for a sine qua non of scientific inference. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 1:13 pm
(NFP) Term. of Parent-Child Rel. of M.M., Jerrell Covington v. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 1:48 pm by Guest Author
He was part of a Covington team that filed an amicus brief in Harrow v. [read post]
16 Mar 2008, 6:44 pm
Bankruptcy Court - Covington 08a0143n.06 Tkachik v. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 3:58 am by Edith Roberts
” At Covington’s Inside Energy & Environment blog, Thomas Brugato writes that the court’s decision Monday in Food Marketing Institute v. [read post]
11 May 2020, 6:19 am by Micha Nandaraj Gallo
 Its decision focused on the nature of the harm necessary for Article III standing as outlined in the United States Supreme Court’s 2016 Spokeo, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Jan 2020, 1:00 pm by Rafael Reyneri
  In reaching this conclusion, the court provided a cogent recounting of the FCC’s progressive expansion of the scope of the ATDS definition, which the court stated was rejected in ACA International v. [read post]
On August 1, 2022, the CJEU issued its ruling in Case 184/20 (OT v Vyriausioji tarnybinės etikos komisija) following a referral from the Lithuanian Regional Administrative Court. [read post]
12 Jun 2018, 7:15 am by John Elwood
United States, 17-7177 Issue: Whether, when a criminal defendant has already been convicted of an offense in a state criminal proceeding, the United States may thereafter prosecute the defendant for the same offense without violating the Fifth Amendment’s prohibition on double jeopardy. [read post]