Search for: "State v. Fudge" Results 141 - 160 of 171
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jul 2013, 10:53 am by Dave
 The question here, though, was whether the bedroom tax policy is “manifestly without reasonable foundation” because the bedroom tax involved a question of high policy – the Secretary of State relied on Humphreys v HMRC [2012] 1 WLR 1545, which, in turn, had applied Stec v UK (2006) 43 EHRR 1017 to argue for a different test depending on the ground of discrimination and the type of policy. [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 9:05 pm by John Armour
Allegations of widespread corporate and investor greenwashing cast doubt on the credibility of laudatory net zero pledges, suggesting that they are rife with fudge. [read post]
24 Apr 2025, 11:36 pm by Kevin
He fudged, blamed somebody else, and generally tried to avoid admitting what the court already knew. [read post]
2 Aug 2008, 12:54 am
: (Holman’s Biotech IP Blog), Daiichi’s open offer for 20% in Ranbaxy awaits Sebi nod: (GenericsWeb), Australia/India: Strides shows thumbs up for Indian generic industry acquiring controlling interest in Ascent: (Spicy IP), Europe: Significant date ahead for EU Paediatric Regulation: (SPC Blog), India: Grave diggers, ‘immoral’ patent and the National Biotech Regulatory Authority: (Spicy IP), UK: Monster trade mark infringement case: court reveals its thinking… [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 6:14 am
The president stopped off for a hot fudge sundae during his campaign trip to Durham, N.H., on Monday. [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 6:03 am by Nietzer
” Under the UK Bribery Act, policies are discussed in the Six Principles of an Adequate Procedures compliance program under Principle V – Communication, where it states “The business seeks to ensure that its bribery prevention policies and procedures are embedded and understood throughout the company through internal and external communication, including training, that is proportionate to the risks it faces. [read post]
26 Jan 2017, 6:35 am by Jonathan Bailey
” A 2010 Fourth Circuit case, Universal Furniture International, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Aug 2011, 10:42 pm by Russell Jackson
  Notably, this "fudging the lines" approach is the direct opposite of the first draft of Section 3 of the Restatement, which provided: Section 3 is limited to manufacturing defects. . . . [read post]
26 Dec 2019, 9:05 pm by Alana Bevan
A coalition of 23 states, counties and municipalities sued the U.S. [read post]
11 May 2007, 12:52 am
Splenda case, or, as it's officially known, Merisant Co. v. [read post]