Search for: "State v. Humbles"
Results 141 - 160
of 560
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Nov 2008, 11:51 am
In an already tapered-down scenario, it is humbly stated that the SC through its recent judgment in Suman Kapur v. [read post]
1 Dec 2021, 10:42 am
AFSCME and Lawrence v. [read post]
12 Jul 2014, 12:21 pm
Quoting Silverman v CBS, Justice Posner stated that "[t]he copyrights on the derivative works, corresponding to the copyrights on the ten last Sherlock Holmes stories, were not extended by virtue of the incremental additions of originality in the derivative works". [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 8:54 am
., Corban v. [read post]
24 Jan 2021, 11:20 am
United States. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 8:15 am
The resulting case is Andritz Sundwig GmbH v. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 10:56 am
" In United States v. [read post]
12 Oct 2015, 12:11 pm
Square-bashing baker makes rival eat humble pieFrom Katfriend and occasional contributor Emma Perot comes a fascinating look beneath the crust of a pie-based dispute over the use of the word "Square". [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 8:27 am
Not really:As this Court stated in Kirlin v. [read post]
5 Jul 2014, 10:21 am
David Simpson, a small-l libertarian Republican Texas state rep from Longview, authored an Independence Day column in his local paper opining that the US Supreme Court's recent ruling in Riley v. [read post]
18 May 2016, 9:29 pm
The state of commercial law in India is in doldrums. [read post]
18 May 2016, 9:29 pm
The state of commercial law in India is in doldrums. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 6:20 am
The case is People v. [read post]
12 Feb 2019, 11:57 am
It was standing room only in the courtroom of US district court judge(and former REGJB ASA and then state court judge) Bob Scola Tuesday morning as AUSA Elizabeth Young rose and addressed the jurors in USA v. [read post]
16 Sep 2018, 8:29 am
After some research in the matter, we believe a tie is not a loss, and Memon, survives another week.See, Bushel’s Case (1670) 124 E.R.1006; Bushel's case; and Entick v Carrington [1765] 19 Howell's State Trials 1030. [read post]
22 Jun 2014, 5:34 am
Under common law a mark is protectable through its use, or as was stated by Justice Pitney in United Drug Co v Theodore Rectans Co: "...the right to a particular mark grows out of its use, not its mere adoption; its function is simply to designate the goods as the product of a particular trader and to protect his good will against the sale of another's product as his". [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 6:00 am
In closing, I leave you with Justice Blackmun’s dissent in Callins v. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 6:00 am
The State of Texas had executed Mr. [read post]
19 Aug 2009, 11:34 am
" When confronted by the officers, he humbly apologized for trespassing. [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 6:30 am
Most famously, all fifty states make 21 the legal drinking age because in the most important pre-Sebelius conditional funding case, South Dakota v. [read post]
