Search for: "State v. Kelly" Results 141 - 160 of 2,123
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Nov 2009, 10:47 am by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
Kelly authors today's post, an article about the meaning of the case. ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ What Does The Florida Supreme Court's Ruling in System Components Corp. v. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 5:01 am by Josh Blackman
Brady's first exposure to Supreme Court cases was reading ones with a direct impact on his life—especially United States v. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 12:00 am by Orin Kerr
On December 5th, the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in a Fourth Amendment case, Messerschmidt v. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 2:14 pm by Ronnie London
By Kelli Sager, Jeffrey Fisher, Rochelle Wilcox, and John (Rory) Eastburg The United States Supreme Court has ruled unanimously that a California city’s audit of a police officer’s text messages was reasonable, and rejected a lawsuit claiming that the review violated the Fourth Amendment. [read post]
3 Jan 2007, 8:19 pm
The "public trust" doctrine got a further boost in Kelly v. 1250 Oceanside Partners, 111 Haw. 205, 140 P.3d 985 (July 28, 2006). [read post]
8 May 2007, 5:53 am
And Ford has even prevailed in that argument once, in Kelly v. [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 8:00 am by Dan Ernst
MackMary Beth and John Tinker and Tinker v. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 12:18 pm by Orin Kerr
On December 5, the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in a Fourth Amendment case, Messerschmidt v. [read post]
4 May 2011, 1:52 pm by Walter Olson
” And another state law requires that school districts field buses with capacity to seat every eligible child every day, which means that in districts like Port Washington, L.I., where many eligible children come to school by other means, buses routinely travel half full, at an unneeded cost the Port Washington superintendent estimates at $2 million a year. [read post]
12 May 2008, 3:32 pm
Supreme Court today granting certiorari on the first issue in what is now called Bell v. [read post]
21 May 2008, 1:43 am
Although the Appellate Division noted that Garnes "was terminable without a hearing and without a statement of the reason for his dismissal," the court, citing York v McGuire, 63 NY2d 760 and Matter of Johnson v Kelly, 33 AD3d 297, said that Garnes failed to demonstrate that his termination was made in bad faith, was unlawful, or was for an impermissible reason. [read post]
11 Jun 2009, 4:59 pm
On June 10, 2009, the Supreme Court issued  its opinion in People v. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 12:10 pm
So I like that part.On the other hand, however -- and I recognize that this is perhaps me being overly grumpy -- given that both the Attorney General and the defendant essentially agreed to everything at issue in this appeal, was it really necessary for the Chief to write a 54 page opinion, an opinion that discusses at length the broad history of California's initiative process, the different and varying provisions of other states, blah blah blah? [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 8:13 am by Amy Howe
Editor’s Note: An earlier version of this post ran on September 23, 2019, as an introduction to this blog’s symposium on Kelly v. [read post]