Search for: "State v. Lerner" Results 141 - 160 of 192
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Dec 2010, 11:36 am by stevemehta
Straw, although “stunned,” did not state there was no settlement. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 3:25 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Some Appellate Division decisions, on which the Appellate Division here relied, have applied strict privity to estate planning malpractice lawsuits commenced by the estate's personal representative and beneficiaries alike (Deeb v Johnson, 170 AD2d 865 [3d Dept 1991]; Spivey, 138 AD2d at 564; Viscardi v Lerner, 125 AD2d 662, 663-664 [2d Dept 1986]; Rossi v Boehner, 116 AD2d 636 [2d Dept 1986]). [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 7:58 am by Sandy Levinson
I strongly recommend that everyone read the debates as collected in the marvelous The Founder's Constitution, edited by Philip Kurland and Ralph Lerner, Volume 2, 182-239, available online thanks to the Liberty Fund, which has also reprinted it in a marvelously produced (and affordable) five-volume version. [read post]
30 Aug 2010, 7:07 am by Daniel Solove
United States dissent, 1919 (His most eloquent defense of free speech) *  The Gitlow v. [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 6:08 am by Guest Blogger
Morrison Much has been written about two recent decisions, one striking down the section of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) that denies federal benefits to same sex couples, who are legally married under the laws of their state, that are available to opposite sex married couples (Gill v. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 3:57 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Some Appellate Division decisions, on which the Appellate Division here relied, have applied strict privity to estate planning malpractice lawsuits commenced by the estate's personal representative and beneficiaries alike (Deeb v Johnson, 170 AD2d 865 [3d Dept 1991]; Spivey, 138 AD2d at 564; Viscardi v Lerner, 125 AD2d 662, 663-664 [2d Dept 1986]; Rossi v Boehner, 116 AD2d 636 [2d Dept 1986]). [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 6:15 am by Steven Peck
They argue that, because the Supreme Court stated that Civil Code section 1717 bars contractual attorneys' fees in voluntarily dismissed cases only with respect to "causes of action sounding in contract" (Santisas v. [read post]
9 May 2010, 11:54 am by Omar Ha-Redeye
Dardi, J. applied the principle in Glover v. [read post]
29 Jan 2010, 9:32 am by David Stras
Louisiana and the Supreme Court’s Denial of the State’s Petition for Rehearing Signal for the Future” on SSRN, see here. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 2:05 am
The Associated Press State & Local Wire, January 4, 2010 Monday 2:47 AM GMT, , STATE AND REGIONAL, 142 words, NYC-funded handout called 'how-to' for drug users, NEW YORK ... [read post]