Search for: "State v. McDonnell "
Results 141 - 160
of 632
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Feb 2012, 8:24 am
McDonnell has not yet taken a position on the personhood bill. [read post]
19 Sep 2016, 9:01 am
"In Unanimously Wrong, Dean Chemerinsky explains why the "Supreme Court's decision in McDonnell v. [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 10:15 am
That was Justice Ginsburg after she was referred to as Justice O'Connor during an oral argument today in United States v. [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 6:47 am
"Social Justice Meets Property Law: Realigning Patent Law’s Asymmetric Contour in Novartis. v. [read post]
8 Apr 2015, 4:58 am
In Butler v. [read post]
20 Sep 2011, 7:39 pm
The Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit recently held in Rodgers v. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 10:00 pm
To read, “USPTO Issues Guidance on Mayo v. [read post]
10 Feb 2022, 10:30 am
See, e.g., Morgan v. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 9:01 am
In Rogers v. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 4:00 am
The Appellate Division also noted that the supervisor who allegedly indicated a discriminatory motive was not the ultimate decision-maker, and the record shows that BOE immediately offered Petitioner another tenured track position after terminating his employment in the Homebound Program.The court commented that the same result would obtain whether the matter was analyzed pursuant to the traditional framework set forth in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v Green, 411 US 792, or under a… [read post]
11 Oct 2016, 12:20 pm
McDonnell v. [read post]
24 Sep 2012, 11:00 am
[Rodriguez v. [read post]
24 May 2016, 5:22 am
In a recent May 10, 2016 decision out of the Federal Western District Court of Pennsylvania in the case of Schutte v. [read post]
8 Feb 2022, 2:07 pm
In 2003, California lawmakers enacted Labor Code Section 1102.6, setting forth a framework for whistleblower retaliation claims that varied from the burden-shifting test established by the United States Supreme Court in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 5:09 am
In Keys v. [read post]
3 Feb 2022, 3:11 pm
To fill that gap, California courts borrowed the familiar federal burden-shifting framework of McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
19 Apr 2015, 9:01 pm
In this case, Young v. [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 5:48 am
(It’s called the McDonnell-Douglas test and I’ve talked about it on the blog before.) [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 8:12 am
This week, the United States Supreme Court issued a long-awaited ruling in Young v. [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 8:30 am
In such a case, the disciplinary action is subject to the burden-shifting analysis articulated by the United States Supreme Court in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
