Search for: "State v. Means "
Results 141 - 160
of 68,611
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 May 2024, 6:29 am
Attendees were treated to an afternoon of deeply interesting discussion on how artificial intelligence is permeating the fashion industry and what this ultimately means for rightsholders, AI operators and the state of the law. [read post]
14 May 2024, 10:15 pm
This includes documents recently disclosed as a result of the settlement of Penebaker v. [read post]
14 May 2024, 7:03 pm
In Popa v. [read post]
14 May 2024, 2:02 pm
Fisher: Even if FCANCER is understood as meaning "Fuck Cancer" (rather than, say, "Fight Cancer"), the exclusion of "any plate considered offensive in nature" from the state's personalized plate program was unconstitutionally viewpoint-based and discretionary. [read post]
14 May 2024, 1:14 pm
Seems like you could just write it out.But as long as everyone know what you mean, it probably doesn't really matter much. [read post]
14 May 2024, 10:27 am
" The Supreme Court reaffirmed this in Regan v. [read post]
14 May 2024, 8:56 am
State v. [read post]
14 May 2024, 7:55 am
Juliana v. [read post]
14 May 2024, 6:00 am
UNC and Moody v. [read post]
14 May 2024, 6:00 am
Stating that it had never directly addressed the question and citing Daimler7 and Magill v. [read post]
13 May 2024, 9:06 pm
“Cultivated food product” means any food produced from cultured animal cells. [read post]
13 May 2024, 6:19 pm
State deficiencies in climate litigations and actions of judges Laurent Fonbaustier / Renaud Braillet 165 Part IV: Cities, States and Climate Change: Between Competition, Conflict and Cooperation Global climate governance turning translocal Delphine Misonne 181 America’s Climate Change Policy: Federalism in Action Daniel Esty 193 Local policies on climate change in a centralized State: The Example of France Camille… [read post]
13 May 2024, 5:58 pm
Not only has FDA not accepted RWD in some cases, it has even raised the evidentiary bar by requiring a clinical study as the only adequate means. [read post]
13 May 2024, 3:42 pm
Ernst & Ernst v. [read post]
13 May 2024, 1:59 pm
In Holder v. [read post]
13 May 2024, 8:39 am
A.J.Z. v. [read post]
13 May 2024, 7:36 am
X Corp. v. [read post]
13 May 2024, 6:45 am
City of New York v. [read post]
13 May 2024, 6:41 am
” “Knowing now that the ban actually covers fees, revenues and profits, Rule 5.4(a) means we cannot “share” them ‘with a nonlawyer. [read post]
13 May 2024, 6:00 am
"Substantial evidence in this context means some credible evidence" (Matter of Maxwell v New York City Employees' Retirement Sys., 210 AD3d 1095, 1096 [internal quotation marks omitted]). [read post]