Search for: "State v. Merrill" Results 141 - 160 of 719
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Mar 2020, 10:31 am by Schachtman
Merrill Dow Pharms., Inc., 509 U.S. 579, 592-93 (1993). [5]  Id., citing and quoting United States v. [read post]
11 Jan 2020, 5:48 am by Joel R. Brandes
Civil Rights Law section 65 was amended to provide that any person may elect to resume the use of a former middle name upon divorce or annulment and that the state shall not impose a fee to change the middle name on a state identifying document due to a change in marital status. [read post]
16 Nov 2019, 6:58 pm by Ilya Somin
My talk was in large part based on my book The Grasping Hand: Kelo v. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 9:17 am by Amy Howe
Inslee, involving whether a state can require operators of state-subsidized home daycare centers to accept an exclusive bargaining agent to deal with the state on public-policy issues; Hall v. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 4:00 am by Thomas Merrill
Merrill is the Charles Evans Hughes Professor at Columbia Law School. [read post]
23 Feb 2019, 12:35 pm by admin
This paper presents a survey of federal and state court decisions on these two questions, hoping to offer some guidance to practitioners. [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 7:58 pm by MOTP
And an active one it is indeed, with the state supreme court asked to weigh in on a regular basis. [read post]
7 Dec 2018, 4:05 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Sanders v Grenadier Realty, Inc., 102 AD3d 460, 461 (1st Dept 2013) (precluding re-litigation of issues underlying state claim where identical issues underlying claim were decided by federal court that had refused to exercise jurisdiction over state claims); see also Hudson v Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc., 138 AD3d 511, 515 (1st Dept 2016), lv to appeal denied, 28 NY3d 902 (2016) (party estopped from relitigating “discrete… [read post]
17 Nov 2018, 12:10 pm by Schachtman
Indeed, their brief in other places states their opinion that significance testing is not necessary at all: “Testing for significance, however, is often mistaken for a sine qua non of scientific inference. [read post]
2 Nov 2018, 7:32 pm by Schachtman
Merrill Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 874 F.2d 307, 311-12 (5th Cir. 1989) (“Fortunately, we do not have to resolve any of the above questions [as to bias and confounding], since the studies presented to us incorporate the possibility of these factors by the use of a confidence interval. [read post]