Search for: "State v. Packard" Results 141 - 160 of 357
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jul 2014, 5:18 am
As a result, the Government had not proven by a preponderance of the evidence that the items seized and ultimately searched (the Dell Laptop, the Hewlett Packard Laptop and Centon thumb drive) were seized in accordance with the 4th Amendment.U.S. v. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 4:24 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Supreme Court unanimously held in Cyan, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Oct 2017, 6:19 am by Garrett Hinck
Paul Rosenzweig examined the news that Hewlett Packard Enterprises allowed the Russian military to review the source code for a cybersecurity system used by the Pentagon. [read post]
11 Dec 2009, 4:35 am by Jim Singer
  In the new case, Hewlett-Packard Company v Acceleron LLC, Acceleron sent a letter to HP identifying an Acceleron patent and inviting HP to meet with Acceleron to discuss licensing – but only if HP would agree in writing that no case or controversy existed regarding the patent. [read post]
13 Nov 2015, 2:30 am
It is clear(er) that this is to be intended as actual, rather than potential harm [this conclusion also appears supported further by what is stated at paras 48 and 49, as well as 70]. [read post]