Search for: "State v. Rebecca F."
Results 141 - 160
of 237
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Apr 2024, 2:41 pm
§ 5714(f). [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 8:52 am
F. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 5:21 am
Enviratrands, Inc. and Russell F. [read post]
13 Oct 2008, 12:12 pm
ECJ clarifies rules relating to notice: K-Swiss Inc v OHIM (Class 46) EU Competitiveness Council resolution against counterfeiting and piracy (Class 46) EU states back three-point anti-piracy plan (Managing Intellectual Property) Fuel cells and wind power lead European patent filings for clean energy technology (Green Patent Blog) More non-minor geographical indicator (GI) amendments published (Class 46) No sign of any Community patent progress, despite Verheugen's optimism… [read post]
25 May 2022, 3:26 pm
" Dacey v. [read post]
25 Dec 2018, 3:00 am
P.38.1(f). [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 11:20 am
AbortionKF228.R59 H85 2010Roe v. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 12:05 pm
State Rifle & Pistol Ass'n, Inc. v. [read post]
25 May 2010, 9:56 am
Williamson, The Mediation Center, Savannah, and Leigh F. [read post]
30 Sep 2024, 9:55 am
Where the court made no such finding here, and instead, improperly delegated the parenting time determination to the father, the error required reversalIn Matter of C.M. v. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 5:11 am
In an articlepublished in 1997, Professor Rebecca Tushnet traces “[f]an fiction and organized media fandom… to the second season of Star Trek in 1967,” and cites a much earlier instance of fan fiction when Lord Tennyson imagined what happened next to Ulysses. [read post]
27 Jul 2009, 7:18 am
: Whirlpool Corporation v Kenwood Ltd (IPKat) EWHC (Pat): EP 258 valid in Netherlands but not UK: Novartis AG and Cibavision AG v Johnson & Johnson Medical Ltd & Ors (IPKat) EWHC (QB): When lawfully seized items can’t be retained under s 22 Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (1709 Copyright Blog) United States US General Obama IP vacancies (IP Frontline) Kappos confirmation hearing set for 29 July (IP Watchdog) (IAM) (Peter Zura's 271… [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 3:01 pm
(United States v. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 3:00 am
(Spicy IP) Design v copyright: need for a clear and rational distinction: Microfibres v Giridhar & Co & Ors (Spicy IP) Madras High Court: jurisdiction - can design infringement case can be filed in Court where plaintiff resides? [read post]
11 Nov 2018, 9:50 am
Canner, 645 F. [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 9:44 am
Now the proponents of affirmative consent have moved the battle to the American Bar Association, which this week will consider a resolution urging states to embed the concepts f affirmative consent into their criminal law of the regulation of conduct defined (broadly or narrowly) as sexual or otherwise with respect to which such a principle might be useful. [read post]
14 Feb 2020, 9:52 am
Perfect 10 v. [read post]
2 Apr 2020, 7:58 am
Frase, Richard S. and Julian V. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 1:24 pm
Ltd v. [read post]
8 Aug 2018, 8:16 am
Alzheimer’s Foundation of America, Inc., 307 F. [read post]
