Search for: "State v. Salary"
Results 141 - 160
of 3,739
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Feb 2020, 6:00 am
Supreme Court’s South Dakota v. [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 5:53 am
The Retirement and Social Security Law excludes “large raises having the effect of inflating the members final average salary” in determining the member’s retirement allowance Chichester v DiNapoli, 2013 NY Slip Op 05283, Appellate Division, Third Department Gilbert L. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 4:00 am
Overtime paid to a police officer for “special-duty” for service performed for a private entity not included in determining the “final average salary” for retirement purposesTamucci v DiNapoli, 2015 NY Slip Op 08027, Appellate Division, Third DepartmentBetween 1989 and 2009, Town and Village of Harrison Police Department [HPD] police sergeant Mark Tamucci was a member of New York State Police and Fire Retirement System [PFRS]. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 3:37 am
Eligibility for unemployment insuranceGeracitano v Comm. of Labor, 277 AD2d 558Barbara A. [read post]
14 Jul 2017, 10:12 am
A federal appellate court reached this conclusion recently in Rizo v. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 2:59 pm
(See Baden-Winterwood v. [read post]
16 Aug 2018, 4:00 am
Evaluating the inclusion of "longevity allowance payments" in computing an employee's final average salary for retirement benefit purposesBohlen v DiNapoli,2018 NY Slip Op 05720, Appellate Division, Third DepartmentIn this action Petitioners ask the court to review the Comptroller determination excluding certain compensation from the final average salary in calculating the retirement benefits of 11 long-term, executive level key employees [Petitioners] of… [read post]
29 Jan 2020, 2:04 pm
” United States v. [read post]
30 Dec 2008, 10:40 pm
In In re Brisman v. [read post]
27 May 2022, 8:19 am
The Case of Hughes v. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 8:04 am
Because not every state that has an overtime requirement recognizes the HCE exemption, it is also important to confirm compliance with state law. [read post]
20 Jan 2010, 3:25 am
Reinstatement following termination pursuant to §73 of the Civil Service LawMatter of Hoover v County of Broome, 23 Misc 3d 1134(A)Keith Hoover sued Broome County, seeking a court order annulling the County’s decision to “terminate his employment” pursuant to Civil Service Law §73,* and compelling his reinstatement with back salary and employment benefits.Although not so stated in the decision, [read post]
22 Jul 2009, 3:00 am
United States, No. 06-211 T (Fed Cl. [read post]
31 Mar 2023, 8:56 am
Today's advance release workers’ compensation law opinion: Kelly v. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 1:31 pm
(U.S.S.C., April 24, 2018, Oil States Energy Services, LLC v. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 8:23 am
First, the court stated that the employment agreement in question distinguished salary, pensions and car allowance under the heading of ‘remuneration’, but that the termination provision specifically just referenced salary. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 8:23 am
First, the court stated that the employment agreement in question distinguished salary, pensions and car allowance under the heading of ‘remuneration’, but that the termination provision specifically just referenced salary. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 8:23 am
First, the court stated that the employment agreement in question distinguished salary, pensions and car allowance under the heading of ‘remuneration’, but that the termination provision specifically just referenced salary. [read post]
6 Feb 2008, 3:53 pm
He said that if he's read anything coming out of Alabama in the Renfroe v. [read post]
18 May 2012, 12:55 pm
The United States opposed the judges’ petition for rehearing en banc. [read post]
