Search for: "State v. T. P. D."
Results 141 - 160
of 3,987
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Mar 2020, 8:24 am
In Dauksis v. [read post]
30 May 2013, 9:05 pm
” Slip p. 4-5, Quoting Harrington v. [read post]
30 Oct 2009, 7:33 am
No. 09-525-JJF (D. [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 4:00 am
" This failure, said the State, resulted in certain employees being identified in the stipulation as P S and T unit employees although they, in fact, continued to perform duties that are appropriately deemed managerial or confidential within the meaning of the Taylor Law.The Director denied the motion and, ultimately, PERB granted PEF's petition to the extent of placing the 250 positions in the P S and T unit. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 11:20 am
Ford v. [read post]
18 May 2012, 1:21 pm
United States v. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 4:00 am
From SSRN:Michael P. [read post]
1 Dec 2015, 7:19 am
P. 3.191(b). [read post]
6 Sep 2018, 1:43 pm
” Areeda & Hovenkamp §5.02; accord, Kalinowski §24.02[1]; United States v. [read post]
24 Feb 2009, 3:05 pm
So earlier today I mentioned the cert grant in Salazar v. [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 9:10 pm
T. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 2:23 pm
& T. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 5:50 am
El texto es largo (son más de 70 páginas) y puede ser algo farragoso o técnico sobre todo al principio. [read post]
18 May 2015, 7:29 am
(d) Summary of Rationale: The state court’s divorce decree did not meet any of the requirements for a QDRO. [read post]
20 Sep 2018, 7:17 am
La procédure orale devant la chambre de recours a eu lieu le 13 juin 2018.V. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 7:15 pm
In 1988, the state botched D’Ambrosio’s trial by violating Brady v. [read post]
2 Mar 2021, 7:25 pm
Samsung and FTC v. [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 6:00 am
See Sutliff v. [read post]
27 Dec 2012, 3:47 pm
No. 98-857, pt. 1, p. 14 (1984). [read post]
27 Oct 2018, 10:58 am
Law, (4th ed. 2013) Corporate Reorganizations § 19.10[C], p. 19-103; Phillips v. [read post]