Search for: "State v. T. P. D." Results 141 - 160 of 3,987
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Mar 2016, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
" This failure, said the State, resulted in certain employees being identified in the stipulation as P S and T unit employees although they, in fact, continued to perform duties that are appropriately deemed managerial or confidential within the meaning of the Taylor Law.The Director denied the motion and, ultimately, PERB granted PEF's petition to the extent of placing the 250 positions in the P S and  T unit. [read post]
6 Sep 2018, 1:43 pm
” Areeda & Hovenkamp §5.02; accord, Kalinow­ski §24.02[1]; United States v. [read post]
24 Feb 2009, 3:05 pm
So earlier today I mentioned the cert grant in Salazar v. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 5:50 am by Gustavo Arballo
 El texto es largo (son más de 70 páginas) y puede ser algo farragoso o técnico sobre todo al principio. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 7:15 pm by Jeff Gamso
In 1988, the state botched D’Ambrosio’s trial by violating Brady v. [read post]